International Journal of Social Science & Economic Research
Submit Paper

Title:
When Sustainability Meets Speculation: A Critical Review of Investor Overconfidence in ESG Stocks and the Market Outcomes

Authors:
Vihaan Bhojnagarwala

Journal: International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research (IJSSER)
ISSN: 2455-8834
Volume: 10
Issue: 6
Publication Date: June 2025
DOI: 10.46609/IJSSER.2025.v10i06.036

|| ||

Vihaan Bhojnagarwala
Student, Oberoi International School, Oberoi Esquire, Mohan Gokhale Road, Off Western Express Highway, Goregaon East, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400063

MLA 8
Bhojnagarwala, Vihaan. "When Sustainability Meets Speculation: A Critical Review of Investor Overconfidence in ESG Stocks and the Market Outcomes." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 10, no. 6, June 2025, pp. 2484-2497, doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2025.v10i06.036. Accessed June 2025.
APA 6
Bhojnagarwala, V. (2025, June). When Sustainability Meets Speculation: A Critical Review of Investor Overconfidence in ESG Stocks and the Market Outcomes. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 10(6), 2484-2497. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2025.v10i06.036
Chicago
Bhojnagarwala, Vihaan. "When Sustainability Meets Speculation: A Critical Review of Investor Overconfidence in ESG Stocks and the Market Outcomes." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 10, no. 6 (June 2025), 2484-2497. Accessed June, 2025. https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2025.v10i06.036.

References

[1] . Byrne, D. (n.d.). What Is a Corporate Governance framework? Corporate Governance Institute. Retrieved April 18, 2025, from
[2] . https://www.thecorporategovernanceinstitute.com/insights/lexicon/what-is-a-corporate-governance-framework/
[3] . Cruciani, C., Rigoni, U., & Villanova, N. (2024). Behavioral Biases in the Sustainability Framework: an Empirical Study. In Università Ca’Foscari Venezia.
[4] . https://unitesi.unive.it/retrieve/819d2ef1-28b5-4781-867a-3a9841ca7846/893731-1287567.pdf
[5] . Deka, J., Sharma, M., Agarwal, N., & Tiwari, K. (2023). LINKING ESG-INVESTING CONSCIOUSNESS, BEHAVIORAL BIASES, AND RISK-PERCEPTION: SCALE VALIDATION WITH SPECIFICS OF INDIAN RETAIL INVESTORS. Ejobsat, 9(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.11118
[6] . Downey, L., Scott, G., & Eichler, R. (2024, October 3). Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH): Definition and Critique. Investopedia.
[7] . https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/efficientmarkethypothesis.asp
[8] . Hayes, A., Miller, K., & Kvilhaug, S. (2025, April 21). What Is Overconfidence bias? Can It Harm Your Investment returns? Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/overconfidence-bias-7485796
[9] . Imade, O., & Agbashe, E. (2024). Impact of Cognitive Biases on ESG Investment Decisions. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4907383
[10] . Investopedia , Scott, G., & Courage, A. (2024, July 30). What Is ESG Investing? Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/environmental-social-and-governance-esg-criteria.asp
[11] . PRISMAStatement. (n.d.). Welcome to the PRISMA Website. PRISMA. Retrieved April 18, 2025, from https://www.prisma-statement.org/
[12] . Publicnow. (2022, July 13). EcoOnline: Half of Employees See ESG Reporting as a Box-Ticking Exercise. MarketScreener. https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/ECOONLINE-HOLDING-AS-120591110/news/EcoOnline-Half-of-employees-see-ESG-Reporting-as-a-Box-Ticking-Exercise-40970511/
[13] . Raut, R., & Kumar, R. (2018). Investment Decision-Making Process Between Different Groups of Investors: A Study of Indian Stock Market. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 14(1-2), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X18813770
[14] . United Nations. (n.d.). Greenwashing – the Deceptive Tactics behind Environmental Claims. United Nations. Retrieved April 18, 2025, from
[15] . https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/climate-issues/greenwashing
[16] . Upadhyaya, C., & Sandanshive, V. (2023). A Study of Impact of Behavioural Factors on ESG Investment. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 29(01). https://doi.org/10.47750/cibg.2023.29.01.039
[17] . Wang, Y., Han, Y., Du, Q., & Hou, D. (2023). Executive Overconfidence and Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance. Sustainability, 15(21), 15570. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115570

ABSTRACT:
The review paper attempts to compile, analyse, evaluate, and critique research papers from different geographies, including Italy and India. The paper explores and interprets five research papers, all of which focus on overconfidence, among other behavioural biases and their impacts on ESG decision-making. All the research papers are published after 2015, after the Paris Climate Agreement, which was an important marker for increased efforts from companies to improve their products and fit them to the highest standards of environmental, social, and governance aspects. The review paper explores their methodology, including its strengths and weaknesses; results, including the statistics and their implications; and limitations, those recognised by the authors and those that can be inferred. Finally, the review paper concludes the results and talks about the solutions that were provided by the five studies to try to mitigate the effects of overconfidence and other behavioural biases in ESG decision-making. All the papers have similar results: all five studies highlight the role played by cognitive biases, especially overconfidence bias, in poor decision-making in ESG investments. The studies have also found that the investors' values play a huge role in decision-making. Finally, the studies are suggesting many solutions, such as transparency by providing non-financial information, third-party certification of rating agencies and investor education about the basic pillars of ESG to mitigate the impacts of cognitive biases on decision-making.

IJSSER is Member of