The Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment in the Relationship
between Equity Sensitivity and Faculty Retention: A Social Exchange Theory
Perspective

Kanis Fatema; Mridul Kanti Das

doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2025.v10i09.028

Title: The Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment in the Relationship between Equity Sensitivity and Faculty Retention: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective
Authors: Kanis Fatema and Mridul Kanti Das
Journal: International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research (IJSSER) ISSN: 2455-8834 Volume: 10 Issue: 9 Publication Date: September 2025 DOI: 10.46609/IJSSER.2025.v10i09.028
\|\| \|\|
Kanis Fatema1 and Mridul Kanti Das2 1. Lecturer, Southeast Business School, Southeast University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. 2. Lecturer, Department of Business Administration, Bangladesh Army University of Science and Technology, Nilphamari, Bangladesh.
MLA 8 Fatema, Kanis, and Mridul Kanti Das. "The Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment in the Relationship between Equity Sensitivity and Faculty Retention: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 10, no. 9, Sept. 2025, pp. 4122-4142, doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2025.v10i09.028. Accessed Sept. 2025. APA 6 Fatema, K., & Das, M. (2025, September). The Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment in the Relationship between Equity Sensitivity and Faculty Retention: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 10(9), 4122-4142. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2025.v10i09.028 Chicago Fatema, Kanis, and Mridul Kanti Das. "The Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment in the Relationship between Equity Sensitivity and Faculty Retention: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 10, no. 9 (September 2025), 4122-4142. Accessed September, 2025. https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2025.v10i09.028.
References [1] . Aboobaker, A. A., Al-Gamrh, B., & Al-Ameri, S. M. (2018). Factors influencing employees' intention to stay in Jordanian universities. Journal of Management Development, 37(6), 466–479. [2] . Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422–436. [3] . Allen, R. S., & White, C. S. (2002). Equity sensitivity theory: A test of responses to two types of under-reward situations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14(4), 435–451. [4] . Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley. [5] . Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. [6] . Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. [7] . Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. [8] . Currivan, D. B. (1999). The causal order of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in models of employee turnover. Human Resource Management Review, 9(4), 493–505. [9] . Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. [10] . Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. [11] . Galanis, P., Moysidou, S., Galiatsatos, N., & Katsaros, K. (2024). The impact of emotional intelligence on turnover intention in healthcare: A mediating role of organizational commitment. Journal of Nursing Management, 32(2), 522–530. [12] . Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432. [13] . Guevara, E. P., & Mendoza, M. V. M. (2024). Organizational justice as a mediator in the relationship between organizational commitment and turnover intention among call center agents. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(1), 162–172. [14] . Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. [15] . Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 222–234. [16] . Kickul, J., & Lester, S. W. (2001). Broken promises: Equity sensitivity as a moderator between psychological contract breach and employee attitudes and behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(2), 191–217. [17] . King, W. C., & Miles, E. W. (1994). The measurement of equity sensitivity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(2), 133–142. [18] . Ko, J., & Hur, W. M. (2014). The effects of organizational justice on organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 1003–1010. [19] . Li, C., Zhang, Y., & Li, R. (2024). The impact of servant leadership on turnover intention: The mediating role of organizational commitment in IT enterprises. Behavioral Sciences, 14(3), 205. [20] . Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171–194. [21] . Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. [22] . Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Sage Publications. [23] . Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52. [24] . Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O., & Hollingsworth, A. T. (1978). An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied psychology, 63(4), 408. [25] . Naidu, P., Majid, A. H. A., & Chuah, F. (2023). Equity Sensitivity and employee retention through the lenses of social exchange theory among specialist doctors in Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies, 9(4), 553-564. [26] . Nassè, T. B. (2021). The concept of equity: Definitions and theories in a marketing perspective. Academia Letters, Article 325. [27] . Sauley, K. S., & Bedeian, A. G. (2000). Equity sensitivity: Construction of a measure and examination of its psychometric properties. Journal of Management, 26(5), 885–910. [28] . Suifan, A. A., Abdallah, A. B., & Obeidat, B. Y. (2017). The impact of internal marketing on nurse’s retention: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Research in Nursing, 22(4), 287–298. [29] . Sultan, S., & Kamran, R. (2011). Perceived organizational fairness and employee retention: Evidence from higher education institutions. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(16), 45–53. [30] . Sultan, S., & Kamran, F. (2011). Equity sensitivity predicting job satisfaction and commitment. JISR Management and Social Sciences & Economics, 9(1), 1–10. [31] . Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259–293.
ABSTRACT: Faculty retention is a critical concern for private universities in Bangladesh, as turnover disrupts academic performance and increases institutional costs. Drawing on Social Exchange Theory (SET), this study investigates the relationship between equity sensitivity and employees’ intention to stay, with organizational commitment as a mediating mechanism. A mixed-methods approach was employed: quantitative data were collected from 97 faculty members using validated scales for equity sensitivity, organizational commitment, and intention to stay, while qualitative insights were obtained through focus group discussions with 27 participants. Structural equation modeling results reveal that equity sensitivity significantly influences intention to stay, both directly and indirectly through organizational commitment, with the mediating effect being particularly strong. Qualitative findings corroborate that perceptions of fairness in promotion, compensation, training, job security, and work–life balance foster reciprocity, enhancing commitment and retention, whereas perceived inequities diminish employees’ intention to remain. These findings highlight the importance of fair workplace practices and affective organizational commitment in retaining equity-sensitive faculty. The study provides practical guidance for HR managers in designing equitable policies and contributes theoretically to understanding retention dynamics in higher education.

IJSSER is Member of