Access Without Parity in Achievement? Gender Gaps in School Participation
and Learning Outcomes in Jharkhand

Dr. Renu Gupta

doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2025.v10i12.046

Title: Access Without Parity in Achievement? Gender Gaps in School Participation and Learning Outcomes in Jharkhand
Authors: Dr. Renu Gupta
Journal: International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research (IJSSER) ISSN: 2455-8834 Volume: 10 Issue: 12 Publication Date: December 2025 DOI: 10.46609/IJSSER.2025.v10i12.046
\|\| \|\|
Dr. Renu Gupta Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Y.B.N., University, Ranchi, Jharkhand
MLA 8 Gupta, Dr. Renu. "Access Without Parity in Achievement? Gender Gaps in School Participation and Learning Outcomes in Jharkhand." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 10, no. 12, Dec. 2025, pp. 6890-6906, doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2025.v10i12.046. Accessed Dec. 2025. APA 6 Gupta, D. (2025, December). Access Without Parity in Achievement? Gender Gaps in School Participation and Learning Outcomes in Jharkhand. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 10(12), 6890-6906. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2025.v10i12.046 Chicago Gupta, Dr. Renu. "Access Without Parity in Achievement? Gender Gaps in School Participation and Learning Outcomes in Jharkhand." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 10, no. 12 (December 2025), 6890-6906. Accessed December, 2025. https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2025.v10i12.046.
References [1] . Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. National Bureau of Economic Research. [Available at: https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/human-capital-theoretical-and-empirical-analysis-special-reference-education-first-edition] [2] . Duflo, E. (2012). Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051–1079. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.4.1051 [3] . Klasen, S. (2002). Low schooling for girls, slower growth for all? Cross-country evidence on the effect of gender inequality in education on economic development. The World Bank Economic Review, 16(3), 345–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhf004 [4] . Mehta, A. C. (2025). UDISE+ 2022–23 and 2023–24 analysis. Education for All in India. https://educationforallinindia.com/udiseplus-2022-23-and-2023-24-analysis-by-arun-c-mehta/ [5] . Mehta, A. C. (2026). School education in Jharkhand: Where do we stand? A comprehensive analysis based on UDISE+ data: 2021–22 to 2024–25. Education for All in India. https://educationforallinindia.com/school-education-in-jharkhand-where-do-we-stand-a-comprehensive-analysis-based-on-udise-data-2021-22-to-2024-25/ [6] . Ministry of Education. (2022, May 25). Ministry of Education releases National Achievement Survey (NAS) 2021 report [Press release]. Press Information Bureau, Government of India. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1828301 [7] . Ministry of Education. (2024). Report on Unified District Information System for Education Plus (UDISE+) 2023–24. Department of School Education and Literacy, Government of India. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/statistics-new/udise_report_nep_23_24.pdf [8] . National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2017). National Achievement Survey 2017: Jharkhand state learning report. https://ncert.nic.in/pdf/NAS/src/Jharkhand.pdf [9] . National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2021). National Achievement Survey 2021: Jharkhand state report card. https://nas.gov.in/report-card/2021 [10] . NITI Aayog. (2025). Summary report for the state of Jharkhand. Government of India. https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2025-07/Summary-Report-Jharkhand%20(1).pdf [11] . Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner. (2011). Census of India 2011: Provisional population totals. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. [12] . Press Trust of India. (2022, May 27). Gap in mathematics learning outcomes of girls and boys grows in higher classes: NAS 2021. Careers360. https://news.careers360.com/gap-in-mathematics-learning-outcomes-of-girls-and-boys-grows-in-higher-classes-nas-2021 [13] . Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.. [14] . Singh, U. (2019). A comparative study of the trends of public expenditure on education in India with special reference to school education. Journal of Economic & Social Development, 15(1), 45–58. [15] . Singh, U. (2022). Status of women and child development in India: A comparative study of the states of Bihar and Jharkhand. Journal of Economic & Social Development, 18(1), 24–39. [16] . World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education’s promise. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2018
ABSTRACT: This paper examines the gender-based structure of school education in Jharkhand by integrating the National Achievement Survey (NAS) for 2017 and 2021, which measures competency-based learning of students in Classes 3, 5, 8 and 10, and the Unified District Information System for Education Plus (UDISE+) administrative census from 2021–22 through 2024–25. The study provides a gender-disaggregated panel of achievement scores, Gross Enrolment Ratios (GER), the Gender Parity Index (GPI), transition rates and dropout rates. The empirical evidence uncovers a structural paradox: while targeted state interventions have effectively eliminated gender gaps in physical school access driving the GPI to or above unity across primary and upper-primary levels a persistent and widening gap emerges in quantitative learning. In mathematics, an initial gender parity at the foundational stage systematically gives way to a male advantage that peaks by Class 10, where the national female mean of 216 trails the male mean of 219 on a 500-point scale. The analysis situates these findings within Jharkhand’s socioeconomic landscape; a 26.2 percent Scheduled Tribe population, a 55.4 percent female literacy rate, seasonal labour migration and a fragile secondary-school network and develops a human capital production framework to interpret them. The analysis identifies secondary-school retention and the in-classroom mathematics gap as the binding constraints on girls’ educational attainment. The paper concludes with policy reorientations aligned with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 targets for 2030, synthesising recent macro-fiscal data indicating that state level structural constraints, rather than household apathy, act as the primary impediment to bridging the quantitative skills deficit.

IJSSER is Member of