Evaluating the Economic and Environmental Efficacy of Global Carbon
Offset Markets: Perspectives from the Global South

Aarav Kumar

doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2026.v11i06.015

Title: Evaluating the Economic and Environmental Efficacy of Global Carbon Offset Markets: Perspectives from the Global South
Authors: Aarav Kumar
Journal: International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research (IJSSER) ISSN: 2455-8834 Volume: 11 Issue: 6 Publication Date: June 2026 DOI: 10.46609/IJSSER.2026.v11i06.015
\|\| \|\|
Aarav Kumar Inventure Academy
MLA 8 Kumar, Aarav. "Evaluating the Economic and Environmental Efficacy of Global Carbon Offset Markets: Perspectives from the Global South." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 11, no. 6, June 2026, pp. 2686-2692, doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2026.v11i06.015. Accessed June 2026. APA 6 Kumar, A. (2026, June). Evaluating the Economic and Environmental Efficacy of Global Carbon Offset Markets: Perspectives from the Global South. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 11(6), 2686-2692. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2026.v11i06.015 Chicago Kumar, Aarav. "Evaluating the Economic and Environmental Efficacy of Global Carbon Offset Markets: Perspectives from the Global South." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 11, no. 6 (June 2026), 2686-2692. Accessed June, 2026. https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2026.v11i06.015.
References [1] . Brookings Institution, The Economics of Carbon Pricing. Washington, DC, 2023. [2] . Raphael Calel and Antoine Dechezleprêtre, “Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change,” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 173–191, 2016. [3] . Erle C. Ellis, et al., “People Have Shaped Most of Terrestrial Nature for at Least 12,000 Years,” PNAS, vol. 116, no. 17, pp. 7978–7985, 2019. [4] . Klaus Gugler, Akira Hashinuma and Michael Liebensteiner, “Carbon Pricing and the Merit Order Effect,” Energy Economics, vol. 96, 2021. [5] . IPCC, AR6 Working Group III: Mitigation of Climate Change. Geneva, 2022. [6] . Richard Newell, William Pizer and Daniel Raimi, “Carbon Market Design, Stability, and Reform,” Energy Policy, vol. 75, pp. 14–22, 2014. [7] . OECD, Making Carbon Markets Work. Paris, 2021. [8] . Lambert Schneider, et al., “Environmental Integrity of International Carbon Market Mechanisms,” Climate Policy, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 386–400, 2019. [9] . TEEB, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Geneva, 2018. [10] . UNEP, Emissions Gap Report. Nairobi, 2023. [11] . Verra, Independent Review of REDD+ Crediting. Washington, DC, 2023. [12] . World Bank, WAVES: Wealth Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services. Washington, DC, 2020.
ABSTRACT: As climate change intensifies, governments and corporations are turning to carbon offset markets and nature-based solutions to meet emission targets. Yet critics argue these mechanisms allow wealthy nations and firms to “buy their way out” of real reductions, while creating new inequities for developing economies. This paper evaluates the economic and environmental effectiveness of carbon offset markets as a tool for reducing global emissions. By analyzing market design flaws including additionality, leakage, and permanence, this study demonstrates that baseline over-crediting and geographic emission shifting undermine market integrity. Furthermore, the economic dynamics of "carbon Dutch disease" and "green grabbing" expose developing resource-rich nations to severe macroeconomic vulnerabilities. This paper argues that carbon offsets must not substitute for direct domestic decarbonization. It concludes by proposing a framework of structural policies—including an International Baseline Registry under Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement, a tiered additionality rating system, and localized developmental safeguards—to transition offsets into a credible, secondary pillar reserved strictly for residual emissions.

IJSSER is Member of