International Journal of Social Science & Economic Research
Submit Paper

Title:
Asset Quality Across Indian Public-Sector Banks: Persistence, Regime-Dependence, and a Forward Stress Test

Authors:
Mihir Khanna

Journal: International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research (IJSSER)
ISSN: 2455-8834
Volume: 11
Issue: 7
Publication Date: July 2026
DOI: 10.46609/IJSSER.2026.v11i07.009

|| ||

Mihir Khanna
Ashoka University

MLA 8
Khanna, Mihir. "Asset Quality Across Indian Public-Sector Banks: Persistence, Regime-Dependence, and a Forward Stress Test." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 11, no. 7, July 2026, pp. 2991-3000, doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2026.v11i07.009. Accessed July 2026.
APA 6
Khanna, M. (2026, July). Asset Quality Across Indian Public-Sector Banks: Persistence, Regime-Dependence, and a Forward Stress Test. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 11(7), 2991-3000. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2026.v11i07.009
Chicago
Khanna, Mihir. "Asset Quality Across Indian Public-Sector Banks: Persistence, Regime-Dependence, and a Forward Stress Test." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 11, no. 7 (July 2026), 2991-3000. Accessed July, 2026. https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2026.v11i07.009.

References

[1] . V. V. Acharya, Quest for Restoring Financial Stability in India. New Delhi: SAGE Publications, 2020.
[2] . R. Beck, P. Jakubik, and A. Piloiu, “Key determinants of non-performing loans,” Open Economies Review, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 525–550, 2015.
[3] . A. Ghosh, “Banking-industry specific and regional economic determinants of non-performing loans,” Journal of Financial Stability, vol. 20, pp. 93–104, 2015.
[4] . N. Klein, “Non-performing loans in CESEE,” IMF Working Paper 13/72, 2013.
[5] . D. P. Louzis, A. T. Vouldis, and V. L. Metaxas, “Macroeconomic and bank-specific determinants of non-performing loans in Greece,” Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1012–1027, 2012.
[6] . S. Nickell, “Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects,” Econometrica, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1417–1426, 1981.
[7] . M. Nkusu, “Nonperforming loans and macrofinancial vulnerabilities in advanced economies,” IMF Working Paper 11/161, 2011.
[8] . R. G. Rajan, Note to the Parliamentary Estimates Committee on Bank NPAs. Government of India, 2018.
[9] . Reserve Bank of India, Revised Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) Framework for Banks, RBI/2021-22/118, 2021.
[10] . Reserve Bank of India, Financial Stability Report, June 2026. Mumbai: RBI, 2026.
[11] . V. Salas and J. Saurina, “Credit risk in two institutional regimes,” Journal of Financial Services Research, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 203–224, 2002.

ABSTRACT:
This study examines the dynamics of asset quality across all twelve Indian public-sector banks (PSBs) over fiscal years 2011–2026, using a merger-consistent (pro-forma) panel of 192 bankyears constructed from Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data and bank disclosures. The empirical workhorse is deliberately simple: the canonical non-performing-loan (NPL) determinants panel, in which the gross non-performing-asset (GNPA) ratio is regressed on its own lag, real GDP growth, the ten-year government-bond yield, and lagged credit growth, with bank fixed effects and standard errors clustered by bank. Three findings emerge. First, asset quality is highly persistent: the autoregressive coefficient is about 0.71 with the full set of controls—implying a half-life of roughly two years—and is robust to adding year fixed effects and to excluding the pandemic years. Second, the relationship between GNPAs and the macroeconomy is not structurally stable: interest rates matter, but the coefficient on GDP growth is weak and wrong signed in the pooled panel, and when the identical regression is estimated separately before and after the AQR the GDP coefficient collapses from +1.20 to zero—evidence that the 2016 surge was a supervisory recognition event rather than a business-cycle effect. Third, a transparent, calibrated stress test—reconciled to the RBI June 2026 Financial Stability Report—finds that all twelve banks remain above the eight-per-cent CET1 prompt-corrective-action floor even under a severe five-percentage-point GDP contraction, with the asset-weighted GNPA ratio rising from 1.94 to 3.93 per cent. Cross-sectionally, the stressed-capital ranking is governed by starting capital and bank size rather than current asset quality.

IJSSER is Member of