International Journal of Social Science & Economic Research
Submit Paper

Title:
Comprehensive Field Data Collection Itinerary Planning for Monitoring and Evaluation: A Framework for Strengthening Field Implementation

Authors:
Isaack Michael Nguliki* , Renatha Melack, Rehema Kabango, Makarius Mazira and Baraka Baitan

Journal: International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research (IJSSER)
ISSN: 2455-8834
Volume: 11
Issue: 7
Publication Date: July 2026
DOI: 10.46609/IJSSER.2026.v11i07.016

|| ||

Isaack Michael Nguliki* , Renatha Melack, Rehema Kabango, Makarius Mazira and Baraka Baitan
DERICH CONSULTING LIMITED

MLA 8
Nguliki, Isaack Michael, et al. "Comprehensive Field Data Collection Itinerary Planning for Monitoring and Evaluation: A Framework for Strengthening Field Implementation." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 11, no. 7, July 2026, pp. 3087-3111, doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2026.v11i07.016. Accessed July 2026.
APA 6
Nguliki, I., Melack, R., Kabango, R., Mazira, M., & Baitan, B. (2026, July). Comprehensive Field Data Collection Itinerary Planning for Monitoring and Evaluation: A Framework for Strengthening Field Implementation. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 11(7), 3087-3111. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2026.v11i07.016
Chicago
Nguliki, Isaack Michael, Renatha Melack, Rehema Kabango, Makarius Mazira, and Baraka Baitan. "Comprehensive Field Data Collection Itinerary Planning for Monitoring and Evaluation: A Framework for Strengthening Field Implementation." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 11, no. 7 (July 2026), 3087-3111. Accessed July, 2026. https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2026.v11i07.016.

References

[1] . American Evaluation Association. (2025). Guiding principles for evaluators. American Evaluation Association. https://www.eval.org
[2] . Bamberger, M., Vaessen, J., & Raimondo, E. (2016). Dealing with complexity in development evaluation: A practical approach. SAGE Publications.
[3] . BetterEvaluation. (2023). Planning an evaluation. BetterEvaluation. https://www.betterevaluation.org
[4] . Chen, H.-T. (2015). Practical program evaluation: Theory-driven evaluation and the integrated evaluation perspective (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
[5] . Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
[6] . Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
[7] . Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Office of Evaluation. (2015). OED evaluation manual. FAO.
[8] . Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4th ed.). Pearson.
[9] . International Organization for Migration. (2020). Monitoring and evaluation guidelines. IOM.
[10] . OECD. (2021). Applying evaluation criteria thoughtfully. OECD Publishing.
[11] . Patton, M. Q. (2021). Principles-focused evaluation: The GUIDE. Guilford Press.
[12] . Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Henry, G. T. (2018). Evaluation: A systematic approach (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.
[13] . United Nations Children's Fund. (2025). Innovation monitoring, evaluation, and learning toolbox. UNICEF Office of Innovation.
[14] . United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) China. (2022, January). A booklet for research, studies, and evaluations. UNICEF China.
[15] . United Nations Development Programme. (2021). Evaluation guidelines. Independent Evaluation Office, UNDP.
[16] . United Nations Evaluation Group. (2016). Norms and standards for evaluation. United Nations Evaluation Group.
[17] . Wilde Ganzen. (2024). Participatory planning, monitoring, evaluation and learning: Three case studies about the power to learn together in practice (Part 3). Wilde Ganzen.
[18] . World Bank. (2016). Impact evaluation in practice (2nd ed.). World Bank.
[19] . World Health Organization. (2024). Mpox strategic preparedness and response plan: Monitoring and evaluation framework. World Health Organization.

ABSTRACT:
Field data collection is a critical phase of monitoring and evaluation (M&E), yet its operational planning is often simplified into generic schedules that inadequately address the complexities of field implementation. Although evaluation literature provides extensive guidance on evaluation design, logistics, supervision, and implementation planning, limited attention has been given to the comprehensive field data collection itinerary as a distinct operational planning instrument. This paper addresses this gap by conceptualizing the comprehensive field data collection itinerary as a micro-level planning tool that bridges evaluation design and field implementation. Anchored in Implementation Science and Utilization-Focused Evaluation, the paper adopts a practice-oriented case scenario of a hypothetical endline evaluation of a multi-component education programme in Mwanza Region, Tanzania, to demonstrate how a comprehensive itinerary can be systematically developed and operationalized. The proposed framework integrates respondents, activities, data collection methods, responsibilities, logistics, supervision, and scheduling into a single implementation plan. The paper shows that, unlike conventional planning instruments, a comprehensive itinerary enhances coordination, logistical efficiency, methodological consistency, stakeholder engagement, and quality assurance, thereby strengthening the validity, reliability, credibility, and utilization of evaluation evidence. It concludes that comprehensive field data collection itineraries should be institutionalized as a standard component of evaluation practice to improve implementation quality and evidence informed decision-making.

IJSSER is Member of