International Journal of Social Science & Economic Research
Submit Paper

Title:
THE BASIC REGULATION OF JUDICIAL AUTHORITY IN ADJUDICATING CASES BASED ON CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE IN INDONESIA

Authors:
Handry Argatama Ellion , Sudarsono , Abdul Rachmad Budiono , Bambang Sugiri

|| ||

Handry Argatama Ellion1 , Sudarsono2 , Abdul Rachmad Budiono3 , Bambang Sugiri4
1Doctoral Program of Legal Studies, Brawijaya University of Malang
2,3,4Lecturer of Doctoral Program Legal Studies, Brawijaya University of Malang MT Haryono Street No. 169, Malang City, East Java, Indonesia, 65145

MLA 8
Ellion, Handry Argatama, et al. "THE BASIC REGULATION OF JUDICIAL AUTHORITY IN ADJUDICATING CASES BASED ON CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE IN INDONESIA." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 3, no. 6, June 2018, pp. 2503-2518, ijsser.org/more2018.php?id=171. Accessed 2018.
APA
Ellion, H., Sudarsono, Budiono, A., & Sugiri, B. (2018, June). THE BASIC REGULATION OF JUDICIAL AUTHORITY IN ADJUDICATING CASES BASED ON CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE IN INDONESIA. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 3(6), 2503-2518. Retrieved from ijsser.org/more2018.php?id=171
Chicago
Ellion, Handry Argatama, Sudarsono, Abdul Rachmad Budiono, and Bambang Sugiri. "THE BASIC REGULATION OF JUDICIAL AUTHORITY IN ADJUDICATING CASES BASED ON CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE IN INDONESIA." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 3, no. 6 (June 2018), 2503-2518. Accessed , 2018. ijsser.org/more2018.php?id=171.

References
[1]. Language Center, Big Indonesian Dictionary, Jakarta: Gramedia, 2008, p.70.
[2]. Bryan A Garner, Black's Law Dictionary, Eighth Edition, St.Paul Minnesota: Thomson West, 2004, p. 45.
[3]. Andi Sofyan and Abd.Asis, Criminal Procedure Law, An Introduction, Jakarta: Kencana, 2014, p. 24.
[4]. Budiono Kusumohamidjojo, Teori Hukum: Dilema Antara Hukum dan Kekuasaan, Bandung: Yrama Widya, 2016.
[5]. Anton Baker, Ontologi Atau Metafisika Umum, Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1992.
[6]. J. Sudarminta, Epistemologi Dasar: Pengantar Filsafat Pengetahuan,Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2016.
[7]. Gustav Radbruch, Vorschule Der Rechtsphilosophie, Gottingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1965.
[8]. M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007.
[9]. Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penulisan Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana, 2015.
[10]. Bambang Poernomo, Pola Dasar Teori-Asas Umum Hukum Acara Pidana dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1993.
[11]. Lilik Mulyadi, Seraut Wajah Putusan Hakim Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.
[12]. Directorate General of Law and Legislation of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Indonesia, History of the Establishment of Law Number 8 of 1981 on Criminal Procedure Law, Jakarta: Department of Justice of the Republic of Indonesia, 198), p.2.
[13]. Martiman Prodjohamidjojo, Kekuasaan Kehakiman Dan Kewenangan Untuk Mengadili, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1984.
[14]. Munir Fuady dan Sylvia Laura L. Fuady, Hak Asasi Tersangka Pidana, Jakarta: Prenada, 2015.
[15]. Luhut M.P. Pangaribuan, Pengadilan, Hakim, dan Advokat, Jakarta: Pustaka Kemang, 2016.
[16]. Mohammad Taufik Makarao dan Suhasril, Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Teori Dan Praktek, Jakarta: Ghalia, 2010.
[17]. Hukum Online. Kata Ini Yang Mengganggu Dalam KUHAP. Available From: URL:http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5739b688956b2/kata-ini-yang-mengganggudalam kuhap, Monday, May 16th 2016, Accessed on May 1st 2017).
[18]. Rancangan KUHAP berdasarkan Surat Presiden Nomor R-87/Pres/12/2012 tanggal 11 Desember 2012 Jo. Keterangan Presiden Atas RUU KUHAP tanggal 6 Maret 2013.
[19]. Ministry Of Justice. Criminal Procedure Rules. UK: Ministry Of Justice, 2015, Available From: URL: https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedurerules/criminal, Accessed on Februari 28th 2016.

Abstract:
The basic regulation of the judges to adjudicate criminal cases as provided in the provisions of Article 1 to 9 of Criminal Procedure Code has a very wide and profound issue. The issue can be viewed primarily from a philosophical, theoretical, and juridical point of view. This study discusses the basis of judges to adjudicate criminal cases by examining the legislators' considerations of the provisions of Article 1 to 9 of Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning on the Law of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as KUHAP). The results of this research indicate that the consideration of the legislator of the basic arrangement of the judge authority to adjudicate cases only in matters and the manner stipulated in this law as stated in the Criminal Procedure Code is the affirmation of the principle of legality and restriction of judicial authority in the framework of the human rights protection.