IJSSER

Title: INDIGENOUS INSTITUTIONS, COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN TRIBAL SOCIETY: A STUDY
Authors: Tabang Mibang
\|\| \|\|
Tabang Mibang Department of Political Science, Rajiv Gandhi University, Rono Hills, Doimukh-791112(India)
MLA 8 Mibang, Tabang. "INDIGENOUS INSTITUTIONS, COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN TRIBAL SOCIETY: A STUDY." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 3, no. 7, July 2018, pp. 2900-2907, ijsser.org/more2018.php?id=199. Accessed 2018. APA Mibang, T. (2018, July). INDIGENOUS INSTITUTIONS, COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN TRIBAL SOCIETY: A STUDY. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 3(7), 2900-2907. Retrieved from ijsser.org/more2018.php?id=199 Chicago Mibang, Tabang. "INDIGENOUS INSTITUTIONS, COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN TRIBAL SOCIETY: A STUDY." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 3, no. 7 (July 2018), 2900-2907. Accessed , 2018. ijsser.org/more2018.php?id=199.
References [1]. Elwin, V. (1964), A Philosophy for NEFA, Shillong. [2]. Elwin, V. (1965), Democracy in NEFA, Shillong. [3]. Roy, S. (1960), Aspects of Padam- Minyong Culture, Shillong. [4]. Talukdar, A.C. (1987), Political Transition in Grassroots in Tribal India, Omsons Publications Gauhati. [5]. Mibang, T. (1994), Social Change in Arunachal Pradesh, Omsons Publications, Delhi. [6]. Mibang, T. (2010), Contextualising Traditional Social Capital in the Age of Globalisation: Local organizations and sustainability among the Tribes of Arunachal Pradesh, in M.C. Behera & Jumyir Basar (eds.), Interventions and Tribal Development: Challenges before Tribes in India in the era of Globalisation, Seriels Publications, New Delhi (India). [7]. Mibang, T. (2004), Riglap (Reciprocal Cooperation) in Bilat - An Adi village, in Tamo Mibang and M.C. Behera (ed.), Dynamics of Tribal Villages in Arunachal Pradesh: Emerging Realities, Mittal Publication, New Delhi. [8]. Choudhury, J.N. (1983), Arunachal Pradesh from Frontier Tract to Union Territory, Cosmos. Publications, New Delhi. [9]. Pandey, B.B. (1983), Tribal village council of Arunachal Pradesh, Directorate of Research Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh. Publications, New Delhi. [10]. Bhattacharjee, T.K. (1993), The Frontier Trail, Eminent Printing works, Calcutta - 31. Choudhury, J.N.(1973), Arunachal Panorama, Shillong. [11]. Dubey, S.M. (1974), Elites and modernization in Arunachal Pradesh, Monograph (Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh) Shillong. [12]. Dubey, S. (1991), Dynamics of Tribal Local Polity and Panchayati Raj in Arunachal Pradesh, Premiere Publishing House, New Delhi. [13]. Chakravorty, L.N. (1973), Glimpses of the Early History of Arunachal Pradesh, NEFA, Shillong. [14]. Chauhan, S.K. (1980), Caste, Status and Power: Social Stratification in Assam, Classical Publishing Company New Delhi. [15]. Behera, M.C. (1994), Planning and Socio-Economic Development of the Tribals, common wealth Publisher, New Delhi, 1994. [16]. Choudhary, R.K. (1987), Caste and Power Structure in Village India, Inter-India Publications, New Delhi.
Abstract: The institutions are the instruments of the society through which it fulfill its need and aspirations. Society creates, restructure and modifies political, social and economic institutions in accordance with its changing requirements, growing demand, and constraints which in turn condition and moulds the topography of the societal relation as a whole. In case of the tribal societies of Arunachal Pradesh, the institutions are not product of consciously design at any specific point of time but evolved spontaneously through generations, without any external force to meet the different social exigencies. One such practice which still prevails among the Adis amidst the various forces of modernization is the system of Kebang or Baane Ager. The system of Kebang or Baane-Ager through its complex and multiple functions play a vital role in the realm of social networks and coherence. The system of Kebang or Baane Ager is still prevailing among the Adis and sustainably facilitates collective action for achieving mutually beneficial ends. The paper is based on participant observation.

IJSSER is Member of