International Journal of Social Science & Economic Research
Submit Paper

Title:
RESEARCH ON THE IMPACT OF INBOUND OPEN INNOVATION ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE-- FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TECHNOLOGY INTRODUCTION

Authors:
ChEN Jing Jing

|| ||

ChEN Jing Jing
College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China.

MLA 8
Jing, ChEN Jing. "RESEARCH ON THE IMPACT OF INBOUND OPEN INNOVATION ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE- FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TECHNOLOGY INTRODUCTION." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 3, no. 9, Sept. 2018, pp. 4530-4546, ijsser.org/more2018.php?id=321. Accessed Sept. 2018.
APA
Jing, C. (2018, September). RESEARCH ON THE IMPACT OF INBOUND OPEN INNOVATION ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE- FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TECHNOLOGY INTRODUCTION. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 3(9), 4530-4546. Retrieved from ijsser.org/more2018.php?id=321
Chicago
Jing, ChEN Jing. "RESEARCH ON THE IMPACT OF INBOUND OPEN INNOVATION ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE- FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TECHNOLOGY INTRODUCTION." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 3, no. 9 (September 2018), 4530-4546. Accessed September, 2018. ijsser.org/more2018.php?id=321.

References
[1]. Chesbrough, Crowther. Open Innovation: Rasearching a New Paradigm[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
[2]. Wu Guangmou, Sheng Zhaohan. Conflict and synergy between technology introduction and technological innovation [J]. Research Management, 1998, 2(4): 87-90.
[3]. Zhou Hao. Technology Introduction, R&D Spillover and Technological Innovation [J]. Journal of Contemporary Economics, 2003, 10(5): 59-94.
[4]. Zhou Bin, Li Huiwei. Technology Introduction and Technology Progress in Shanghai[J]. Shanghai Economic Research, 2000, 10(9): 43-49.
[5]. Huston, Sakkab. Connect and Develop: Inside Procter & Gamble's New Model for Innovation [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2007, 84(3): 58-67.
[6]. Hu Angang. China's national frontier issues [J]. Leadership Wen Cui, 2003, 12 (5): 28 - 31.
[7]. Wang Zijun. Foreign Direct Investment, Technology Licensing and Technological Innovation [J]. Economic Research, 2003, 15(3): 27-30.
[8]. Hopkins, Bailey. A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context, and the concept of strategy [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1981, 8(1): 61-70.
[9]. Cooper. Optimizing the Stage-Gate Process [J]. Research and Technology Management, 1986, 45(6): 21-27.
[10]. Brown, Svenson. Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos [C]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
[11]. Wu Xiaobo, Chen Ying. Empirical Study on the Choice of R&D Model Based on Absorptive Capacity[J]. Science of Science Research, 2010, 26(11): 22-27.
[12]. Enkel, Gassmann. Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization [J]. Research Policy, 2008, 31(4): 569-588.
[13]. Nadler, Tushman. Strategic organizational design [M]. New York: Harpercollins, 1988.
[14]. Wei Ying. The impact of corporate social capital on technological innovation performance: based on the perspective of absorptive capacity [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2006.
[15]. Kiyota, Okaza K.I. Open Innovation in Practice[J]. Research-Technology Management, 2005, 48(4): 24-28
[16]. Zhang Leiyong, Feng Feng. Research on Foreign Technology Introduction, Domestic Technology Transfer and Regional Innovation Performance in China[J]. Service Science and Management, 2012, 18(1): 21-27.
[17]. Jones, Teegen. Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2000, 11(2): 245 -262.
[18]. Parente, Prescott. Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of national innovation system [J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1995, 19(3): 67 -93.
[19]. Lin Zhongping. Research on institutional environment of independent technological innovation [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University, 2006.
[20]. Li Guojie. How to improve the ability of independent innovation[J]. China Integrated Circuit, 2005, 21(9): 35-41.
[21]. Stock, Greis, Fischer. Strategy as ecology[J]. Academy of Management perspectives, 2001,20(2): 75-93.
[22]. Laursen K, Salter A. Searching high and low: What type of firms use universities as a source of innovation?[J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33(8): 1201-1215.
[23]. Hagedoorn, Cloodt. Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: Evidence from French firm-level data [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2003, 21(9): 1255-1270.
[24]. Wang Wenhua, Zhang Zhuo, Ji Xiaoli. Executives' Holding and R&D Investment: Interest Convergence Effect or Management Defense Effect?[J]. Research and Development Management, 2014, 26(4): 23-31.
[25]. Wang Wenhua, Zhang Zhuo, Chen Yurong, Huang Qi. Research on Technology Diversification and Firm Performance Based on Technology Integration[J]. Science of Science Research, 2015, 33(2): 279-286.
[26]. Von Hipple. The Sources of Innovation [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.

Abstract:
Affected by the economic globalization, the various countries' political and economic pattern has significant changes. It is gradually from the past closed innovation to open innovation. Today, the inbound open innovation has become a hot issue in research of innovation management. This paper puts forward the relationship model between open innovation and firm performance, discusses the parameter of technology innovation, performance and control variables. With the data of high-tech companies as sample, using the empirical analysis to discuss the best strength of technology introduction and provide the management suggestion for the enterprises. The research results show that strength of technology introduction has an inversed U relationship on firm performance. When the strength of technology introduction reaches 0.00359, enterprises get the maximum return on equity. So companies should get the sweet spot in the technology introduction and self-innovation to enhance business performance.