International Journal of Social Science & Economic Research
Submit Paper

Title:
A DICHOTOMY IN INDIAN REPRESENTATIVE SYSTEM (LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT IN MANIPUR AND MAJORITY CARRIES THE VOTE)

Authors:
L. Muhindro

|| ||

L. Muhindro
Head, Department of Human Rights, S. Kula Women's College, Nambol - 795134, Bishnupur District, Manipur

MLA 8
Muhindro, L. "A DICHOTOMY IN INDIAN REPRESENTATIVE SYSTEM (LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT IN MANIPUR AND MAJORITY CARRIES THE VOTE)." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 3, no. 12, Dec. 2018, pp. 7057-7068, ijsser.org/more2018.php?id=498. Accessed Dec. 2018.
APA
Muhindro, L. (2018, December). A DICHOTOMY IN INDIAN REPRESENTATIVE SYSTEM (LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT IN MANIPUR AND MAJORITY CARRIES THE VOTE). Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 3(12), 7057-7068. Retrieved from ijsser.org/more2018.php?id=498
Chicago
Muhindro, L. "A DICHOTOMY IN INDIAN REPRESENTATIVE SYSTEM (LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT IN MANIPUR AND MAJORITY CARRIES THE VOTE)." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 3, no. 12 (December 2018), 7057-7068. Accessed December, 2018. ijsser.org/more2018.php?id=498.

References
[1]. Law Commission of India, Electoral Reforms, Report No.255, March 2015
[2]. Mahesh Rangarajan and Vijay Patidar, (n.d) India: First Past the Post on a Grand Scale, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, retrieved from http://www.idea.int/esd/upload/india.pdf accessed on 22-10-2018
[3]. Constituent Assembly Debates, Proceedings, 1949, Vol. VII dated 4th January, retrieved from http://164.100.47.132/LssNew/constituent/vol7p32.htmln , accessed on 11-10-2018
[4]. La Commission of India, op cit
[5]. Madhav Godbole, Editorial, Reform of the Political System, Economic and Political Weekly, 2004, 39 (28)
[6]. Editorial, A case for proportional representation? 47(11) Economic and Political Weekly; 2012 Arvind Sivaramakrishnan, Editorial, Between Formal and Substantive Legitimacy, 49(19) Economic and Political Weekly (2014).
[7]. Rama Devi V.S. and Mendiratta, S.K. How India Votes: Election Laws, Practice and Procedure, 1167 (3rd edn.). 2014
[8]. Studydhaba, Electoral reforms In India since Independence, retrieved from https://www.studydhaba.com/electoral-reforms-india-pdf/, accessed on 11-9-2018
[9]. BYJU, Electoral Reforms in India-a detailed insight, 2016, September 26, retrieved from https://byjus.com/free-ias-prep/electoral-reforms-in-india, accessed on 11-11-2018
[10]. Jeetender Gupta, Supreme Court India: Negative Voting (NOTA) Judgment, 2013 September 27, retrieved from, http://jeetendergupta.blogspot.com/2013/09/supreme-court-indianegative-voting.html , accessed on 22-10-2018
[11]. Nilesh Ekka, Electoral Reforms in India - Issues and Reforms, National Seminar on "Electoral Politics in North-East India: Analysis of 2018 Assembly Elections", 21st April 2018 at ICSSR-NERC, NEHU Campus, Shillong.
[12]. Law Commission of India, op cit
[13]. Mahesh Rangarajan and Vijay Patidar, op cit
[14]. Constituent Assembly Debates, op cit
[15]. Madhav Godbole, op cit
[16]. Rama Devi V.S. and Mendiratta, op cit
[17]. Studydhaba, op cit
[18]. Studydhaba, op cit
[19]. Jeetender Gupta, op cit
[20]. BYJU op cit

Abstract:
The present analysis is an attempt to analyse on the mode of electing winning candidate in particular with least vote in the Local Self Government; to insight the possible way for partial reformation to elect only the candidate who voted by the majority of vote (50+ %); to examine in dept whether it has system lapses or on the part of execution that many non-serious candidates produced by winnable candidates. The research question involve in this study includes - Is there system lapses on Indian electoral system that elected many minority supported candidate on election though they have highest number of vote? After few decades, the electoral politics in the grass-root democracy shall be in a dismal position in the sense that if they got elected by the support of less than 20 percent or so.