IJSSER

Title: HANDEDNESS AND INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION: A SURVEY OF COLLEGE STUDENTS IN PUNJAB
Authors: Dr. (Mrs.) Kuljeet Kaur Brar
\|\| \|\|
Dr. (Mrs.) Kuljeet Kaur Brar Assistant Professor in Education, University School of Open Learning, Panjab University, Chandigarh
MLA 8 Brar, Dr. (Mrs.) Kuljeet Kaur. "HANDEDNESS AND INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION: A SURVEY OF COLLEGE STUDENTS IN PUNJAB." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 3, no. 12, Dec. 2018, pp. 7412-7420, ijsser.org/more2018.php?id=537. Accessed Dec. 2018. APA 6 Brar, D. (2018, December). HANDEDNESS AND INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION: A SURVEY OF COLLEGE STUDENTS IN PUNJAB. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 3(12), 7412-7420. Retrieved from ijsser.org/more2018.php?id=537 Chicago Brar, Dr. (Mrs.) Kuljeet Kaur. "HANDEDNESS AND INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION: A SURVEY OF COLLEGE STUDENTS IN PUNJAB." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 3, no. 12 (December 2018), 7412-7420. Accessed December, 2018. ijsser.org/more2018.php?id=537.
References [1]. Benbow, C.P. (1986). Physiological correlates of extreme intellectual precocity. Neuropsychologia , 24, 719-725. [2]. Carey, James W.( 1989) Communication as Culture:Essays on Media and Society. Winchester: Un- win Hyman, Chen, Wenhong, Jeffrey Boase and Barry Wellman. “The Global Villagers: Comparing Internet Users and Uses Around the World.” [3]. Coren, S. (1995). Differences in divergent thinking as a function of handedness and sex. American Journal of Psychology , 108, 311-325. [4]. Coren, S. and Porac, C. (1982). Lateral preference and cognitive skills: An indirect test. Perceptual and Motor Skills , 54, 787-792. [5]. Dillon, A. and Watson, C. (1996). Individual differences and the analysis ofusers in HCI [Online]. Available: http://www-slis.lib.indiana.edu/PrePrints/adillon-inddiff.html [1996, December 8]. [6]. Emma L. Pelling, Katherine M. White. Cyber Psychology & Behavior. December 2009, 12(6): 755-759. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0109. [7]. Habib, Marlene (2000). http://www.canoe.ca/Health0007/06_hands.html [8]. Hardyck C, Petrinovich LF (1977). "Left-handedness". Psychol Bull 84(3): 385–404. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.3.385. PMID 859955. [9]. Holder, M. K. (1997). "Why are more people right-handed?". Sciam.com. Scientific American Inc. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=why-are-more-people-right. Retrieved 2008-04-14. [10]. James R. Baker, Susan M. Moore.( 2008 )Cyber Psychology & Behavior. December 2008, 11(6): 747-749. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0053. [11]. Krug, Gary. (2005) Communication, Technology and Cultural Change. London: SAGE Publications, Ltd., [12]. Lewis, R.S. and Harris, L.J. (1990). Handedness, sex, and spatial ability. In S. Coren (Ed.), Left-handedness: Behavioral implications and anomalies (pp. 319-341). New York: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland). [13]. Linda A. Jackson, Yong Zhao, Edward A. Witt, Hiram E. Fitzgerald, Alexander von Eye, Rena Harold.( 2008) CyberPsychology & Behavior. August 2009, 12(4): 437-440. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0286. [14]. Luca Milani, Dania Osualdella, Paola Di Blasio. (2009) CyberPsychology & Behavior. December 2009, 12(6): 681-684. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0071. [15]. Miller, E. (1971). Handedness and the pattern of human ability. British Journal of Psychology , 62, 111-112 [16]. Natsopoulos, D. and Xeromeritou, A. (1989). Verbal abilities of left-handed and right-handed children. Journal of Psychology , 123, 121-132. [17]. Patti M. Valkenburg, Jochen Peter, Alexander P. Schouten. CyberPsychology & Behavior. October 2006, 9(5): 584-590. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584. [18]. Slevin, James. 2000 The Internet and Society. Mal- den, MA: Blackwell, [19]. Valkenburg, P. M., Sumter, S. R. and Peter, J. ,(2001) Gender differences in online and offline self-disclosure in pre-adolescence and adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, no. doi: 10.1348/2044-835X.002001 [20]. Wellman, Barry and Caroline Haythornthwaite, The Internet and Everyday Life. Eds. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2002. 74 -113.
Abstract: The intention of this paper has been to start a process in the teacher’s mind about evaluating quantitatively the degree of handedness of a student and interactive communication. Pedagogy and technology goes hand in hand. Teaching needs new network communication skills, supervision skills etc. might be much more challenging to interact with their students. Technology, especially in communication, has undergone an anthropomorphosis; it has become something alive, something almost supernatural. Based on the research abstracts and websites investigator prepared a conceptual framework incorporating interactive communication and handedness as key determinants of study. Communication, for our purposes, will specially focus on the Internet usage. Within this environment, exists form of speech that serve to help us understand interactive communication patterns. The World Wide Web, like previous technological innovations in the sphere of mass media, is a vessel for communication and, in turn, a vessel of cultural embodiment. The objectives of this study is to verify in an Indian context tor investigate relationships between interactive communication and handedness of college students in Punjab. Social networking platform usage intention for improving the interactive communication and understanding the effect of social networking communication among left handed and right handed male and female students from rural and urban region. Empirical data from 300 participants randomly selected from difference colleges of Punjab were collected using questionnaires on interactive communication and handedness including the additional variables of age, gender and location. Male and female subjects aged from 18 to 30 years old have taken the test. The obtained performance data from these tasks have been computed and analyzed using the t-test and correlation. The proposed degree of handedness and the result of interactive communication did not contradict to each other. The calculated results indicate differences between interactive communication and handedness based on age, gender and location. Additional analyses examined the impact of between interactive communication and handedness on young people's addictive tendencies toward SNWs. These students use the Internet for many hours per week; most utilize it for interpersonal relations than peers who participate in professional communities discussions From these results, it is expected that the proposed method can be useful for detailed and quantitative evaluation of handedness and interactive communication in relation to different pedagogy situations. Results from this study can be used as guidance for education providers to enhance and develop blog and networking platform functions.

IJSSER is Member of