International Journal of Social Science & Economic Research
Submit Paper


Laima Okuneviciute Neverauskiene , Irena Pranskeviciute

|| ||

Laima Okuneviciute Neverauskiene1 , Irena Pranskeviciute2
1. Chief Researcher, Professor, Lithuanian Social Research Centre, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, Vilnius, Lithuania.
2. PhD student in economics, Lithuanian Social Research Centre, A. Gostauto 9, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Neverauskiene, Laima Okuneviciute, and Irena Pranskeviciute. "THE SYSTEM APPROACH TO RESOURCE SCARCITY: BRIDGING ECOLOGY, ECONOMY AND SOCIETY." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 4, no. 9, Sept. 2019, pp. 5896-5912, Accessed Sept. 2019.
Neverauskiene, L., & Pranskeviciute, I. (2019, September). THE SYSTEM APPROACH TO RESOURCE SCARCITY: BRIDGING ECOLOGY, ECONOMY AND SOCIETY. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 4(9), 5896-5912. Retrieved from
Neverauskiene, Laima Okuneviciute, and Irena Pranskeviciute. "THE SYSTEM APPROACH TO RESOURCE SCARCITY: BRIDGING ECOLOGY, ECONOMY AND SOCIETY." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 4, no. 9 (September 2019), 5896-5912. Accessed September, 2019.


[1]. Allouche, J., Middleton, C., & Gyawali, D. (2014). Nexus Nirvana or Nexus Nullity? A Dynamic Approach to Security and Sustainability in the Water-Energy-Food Nexus: Brighton, United Kingdom: STEPS Centre.
[2]. Basilian, M., Rogner, H. et al. (2011). Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach. Energy Policy 39 (12), 7896-7906.
[3]. Benson, D., Gain, A. K., Rouillard, J., & Giupponi, C. (2017). "Governing for the Nexus," in Water-Energy-Food Nexus: Principles and Practices (pp. 77-88), eds. P. Abdul Salam, S. Shrestha, V. Prasad Pandey, and A. K. Anal. Washington, DC: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
[4]. Bleischwitz, R., Hoff, H. et al. (2018). Routledge Handbook of the Resource Nexus. Routledge Handbooks Online.
[5]. Boas, I., Biermann, F., and Kanie, N. (2016). Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: towards a nexus approach. Int. Environ. Agreements-Politics Law Econ. 16, 449-464. Doi: 10.1007/s10784-016-9321-1.
[6]. Chatham House. (2012). Resources Futures. London: Chatham House, available at:,%20Environment%20and%20Development/1212r_resourcesfutures.pdf.
[7]. De Laurentiis, V., Hunt, D. V. L., & Rogers, C. D. F. (2016). Overcoming food security challenges within an energy/water/food nexus (EWFN) approach. Sustainability 8:95. Doi: 10.3390/su8010095.
[8]. Death, C. (2014). The green economy in South Africa: Global discourses and local politics. Politikon 41 (1), 1-22.
[9]. Fairhead, J., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2012). Green grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (2), 237-261.
[10]. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M. (2011). Decoupling Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth. Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme.
[11]. Galaz, V., Biermann et al. (2012). Planetary boundaries -exploring the challenges for global environmental governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4 (1), 80-87.
[12]. Huff, A, Mehta, L. 2015. The new politics of scarcity: a review of political positionings, current trends and their socioeconomic implications. Institute of Development Studies, UK. Resource Politics 2015.
[13]. Kallis, G., Kerschner, C., Martinez-Alier, J. (2012). The economics of degrowth. Ecological Economics, 1-9.
[14]. Kuipers, K., Van Oers, L., Verboon, M. et al. (2018). Assessing environmental implications associated with global copper demand and supply scenarios from 2010 to 2050. Global Environmental Change 49, 106-115.
[15]. Lal, R. (2016). Global food security and nexus thinking. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 71 (4), 85A-90A. Published by Soil and Water Conservation Society.
[16]. McAfee, K. (2014). The post-and future politics of green economy and REDD. In B. Stephan & R. Lane (Eds.), The Politics of Carbon Markets (pp. 237-260). New York: Routledge.
[17]. Mehta, L. (2014). Water and human development. World Development, 59-69.
[18]. Mehta, L., Movik, S., Bolding, A. et al. (2016). Introduction to the special issue - flows and practices: The politics of integrated water resources management (IWRM) in southern Africa. Water Alternatives 9 (3), 389-411.
[19]. Meyer-Emerick, N. (2012). Sustainable Cleveland 2019: Designing a green economic future using the appreciative inquiry summit process. Public Works Management and Policy 17 (1), 52-67.
[20]. NIC (2012). Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds. New York, NY: NIC.
[21]. Obersteiner, M, Walsh. B. et al. (2016). Assessing the land resource-food price nexus of the Sustainable Development Goals. Science Advances 2 (9). e1501499. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1501499.
[22]. Rasmussen, K., Arler, F. (2010). Interdisciplinarity at the human-environment interface. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography 110 (1), 37-45.
[23]. Raworth, K. (2012). A safe and just space for humanity: can we live within the doughnut. Oxfam Policy and Practice: Climate Change and Resilience, 8 (1), 1-26.
[24]. Rockstrom, J. et al. (2016). The world's biggest gamble. Earth's Future 4 (10), 465-470.
[25]. Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W. et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461 (7263), 472-475.
[26]. Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W. et al. (2009). Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society 14 (2): 32.
[27]. Ross, A. (1996). The Lonely Hour of Scarcity. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 7 (3), 3-26.
[28]. Sachs, J. D. (2015). The Age of Sustainable Development. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
[29]. Sepulveda, C. M., Nyst, C., & Hautala, H. (2012). The Human Rights Approach to Social Protection. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland.
[30]. Shepherd, J. M., S. Burian, C. Liu, and S. Bernardes. (2016). Satellite Precipitation Metrics to Study the Energy-Water-Food Nexus within the Backdrop of an Urbanized Globe. Earthzine, doi:
[31]. Simonis Udo, E. (2013). Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. International Journal of Social Economics 40 (4), 385-386.
[32]. Smulders, S., Toman, M., & Withagen, C. (2014). Growth Theory and "Green Growth". OxCarre Working Papers 135. Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Rich Economies, University of Oxford.
[33]. Steffen, W., Richardson, K. et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347 (6223), 1259855. DOI: 10.1126/science.1259855.
[34]. Suckall, N., Stringer, L. C., & Tompkins, E. L. (2014). Presenting Triple-Wins? Assessing Projects That Deliver Adaptation, Mitigation and Development Co-benefits in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa. AMBIO 44 (1), 34-41. Doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0520-0.
[35]. Sweeney, S. (2019). The green new deal's magical realism. New Labor Forum 28 (2), 74-78.
[36]. The Guardian (18 Mar 2019). World faces 'perfect storm' of problems by 2030, chief scientist to warn. Available at:
[37]. UNDP. (2006). Human Development Report. Beyond Scarcity: Power, Poverty and the Global Water Crisis. United Nations Development Programme, New York.
[38]. UNEP. (2009). Rethinking the Economic Recovery: A Global Green New Deal. United Nations Environment Programme.
[39]. UNEP. (2011). Towards a Green Economy Report: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication within the Backdrop of an Urbanized Globe. IEEE Earthzine.
[40]. World Economic Forum. (2011). Global Risks Report. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
[41]. World Economic Forum. (2014). The Future Availability of Natural Resources: a New Paradigm for Global Resource Availability. World Scenario Series. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

Recent decades, the question of resource scarcity and its interrelations with demographic growth and impact to social and economic challenges, became part of global and national policy agendas. WEF, EC, World Bank, UNEP, OECD and global corporations join efforts to identify new models leading to paradigm shift in resource analysis and governance.
The traditional approach to resource through supply chain glasses, where resources exist only as part of the production process, had created a lot of damage to global ecological and social systems. During recent decades scientists and policy makers emphasize the need for a more integrative approach, unveiling interlinks, synergies and trade-offs between different resources, ant their interrelation with economic and social outcomes. The new models, such as Green Economy, Nexus or Doughnut create a shift in thinking about resource scarcity and fuels debates around sustainable economic growth strategies. The article presents main debates around novel approach to resource scarcity and provide comparative overview of the new systemic models of the resource analysis, heading toward sustainable economic growth strategies focusing to better balance of economic development, social inclusion and ecology