International Journal of Social Science & Economic Research
Submit Paper

Title:
ENNEAGRAM PERSONALITY TYPES (ENNEATYPES) AND MARITAL SATISFACTION

Authors:
Simon K. Ndirangu, Sr. Sabina Mutisya, Sr. Jane Gikonyo

|| ||

1Simon K. Ndirangu, 2Sr. Sabina Mutisya, 3Sr. Jane Gikonyo
1. PhD candidate, Department of Psychology, The Counseling Psychology
2. PhD, Department of Psychology, The Catholic University of Eastern Africa
3. PhD, Department of Psychology, Tangaza University College

MLA 8
Ndirangu, Simon K., et al. "ENNEAGRAM PERSONALITY TYPES (ENNEATYPES) AND MARITAL SATISFACTION." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 4, no. 9, Sept. 2019, pp. 6089-6111, ijsser.org/more2019.php?id=468. Accessed Sept. 2019.
APA
Ndirangu, S., Mutisya, S., & Gikonyo, S. (2019, September). ENNEAGRAM PERSONALITY TYPES (ENNEATYPES) AND MARITAL SATISFACTION. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 4(9), 6089-6111. Retrieved from ijsser.org/more2019.php?id=468
Chicago
Ndirangu, Simon K., Sr. Sabina Mutisya, and Sr. Jane Gikonyo. "ENNEAGRAM PERSONALITY TYPES (ENNEATYPES) AND MARITAL SATISFACTION." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 4, no. 9 (September 2019), 6089-6111. Accessed September, 2019. ijsser.org/more2019.php?id=468.

References

[1]. Bowen, J. (2017). Relation intimacy and the enneagram: resource or stress points on the journey to marriage satisfaction. Retrieved from sexualintimacyboulder.com
[2]. Brothers, B. J. (Ed.). (2011). Virginia Satir: Foundational ideas. New York: Routledge.
[3]. Carpenter, D. G. (2015). Resonating personality types for couples: An Enneagram application for predicting marital satisfaction. PhD dissertation: Walden university. http://scholarsworks.wardenu.edu/dissertation
[4]. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B. & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods, designs and analysis (12th ed.). Boston, Pearson Education Limited.
[5]. Collard, D. (2006). Research on well - being some advice from Jeremy Bentham. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36 (3), 330 - 354.
[6]. Daniels, D. (2015). The 45 combinations of enneagram types relationships: How each pairing can disintegrate or Thrive. Retrieved from drdaviddaniels.com/relationships-intimacy/enneagram-types-in-relationship
[7]. Erker, J. (2017). A Summary of a Qualitative Study of Satir Family Therapy: Theoretical and Practical Developments over the Past 30 Years. Satir International Journal, 5 (1), 76-81.
[8]. Faul, Erdfelder, Buchner, and Lang (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods 2009, 41 (4), 1149-1160 doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
[9]. FIDA (K), (2011). Domestic Violence in Kenya: Report of Baseline Survey among Women in Nairobi; Nairobi, FIDA (K).
[10]. Funk J. L. & Rogge R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. J Fam Psychol. 21(4): 572-83. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572.
[11]. Graham, J. M., Diebels, K. J., & Barnow Z. B. (2011). The Reliability of Relationship Satisfaction: A Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 25 (1), 39 - 48.
[12]. Kamatu, K. D. & M'arimi, E. K. (2017). Parental influence on the marital instability of the young couples aged between twenty and thirty-five years in Ruiru Sub-county, Kiambu County-Kenya. International journal of innovative research & development. 6 (4), 112-121.
[13]. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (2014). Marital status by county and districts. Nairobi, Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.
[14]. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (2017). Men and women in Kenya: Facts and figures. Nairobi, Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.
[15]. McGuiness, M. (2007). An introduction to the enneagram. Retrieved from www.wishfulthinking.co.uk/Blog
[16]. Mbiti J. S. (2003). An introduction to African religion 2nd ed.Nairobi: East African Educational Publishers.
[17]. Mbunga, J. M. (2010). An exploratory study of marital satisfaction of forty couples at the Africa Inland Church, Jericho, Nairobi, with the view to inform premarital counseling practices in Kenya Re trieved from https://trove.nla.gov.au/version/237918019
[18]. Mead, N. L., (2005). Personality Predictors of Relationship Satisfaction among Engaged and Married Couples: An Analysis of Actor and Partner Effects. All Theses and Dissertations. 552. Retrieved from https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/552.
[19]. Musau J. M. (2016). Demographic and spatial-temporal dimensions of marital instability and its effects on the family livelihoods in Machakos County, Kenya. Doctoral Dissertation, Kenyatta University School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nairobi, Kenya
[20]. Najarpourian, S., Fatehizadeh M., Etemadi, O., Ghasemi, V., Abedi M. R., & Bahrami, F. (2012). Personality types and marital satisfaction: Interdisciplinary journal of contemporary research in business. 4 (5), 372-38.
[21]. Raulo, L. (2016). The enneagram in relationships: What types go well together? Retrieved from www.lynnroulo.com/enneagram-love-types-go-well-together
[22]. Rebelo, K., Silva, Jr. M. D., & Brito, R. C. S. (2014). Fundamental factors in marital satisfaction: An assessment of Brazilian couple. Psychology, 5(4), 777-784.
[23]. Schneider, J. P. & Corn, R., (2013). Understand Yourself, Understand Your Partner: The Essential Enneagram Guide to a Better Relationship. Create Space Independent Publishing Platform
[24]. Stinnett, N., Stinnett, N., DeGenova, M. K. & Rice, F. P. (2016). Intimate Relationships, Marriages, and Families 9th Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
[25]. Tumuti, D. W., Ireri, A. M., & Tumuti, J. W. (2012). Relationship guidance sources, fear and reasons for marriage among young urban christians in Kenya. International journal of prevention and treatment, 1(2), 31-39.
[26]. Wamue, N. G. & Njoroge, W. N. (2011). Gender paradigm shift within the family structure in kiambu, Kenya: African Journal of Social Sciences 1 (3), 10- 20.
[27]. Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). General traits of personality and affectivity as predictors of satisfaction in intimate relationships: Evidence from self- and partner- ratings. Journal of Personality and social psychology, 68(3), 413-449.
[28]. World Health Organization, (2002).Facts on Intimate Partner Violence. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/world_report/factsheets/en/ipvfacts.pdf.
[29]. Wright, C. (2016). The conscious couple relationship; a new orientation of self-awareness, skills and tools for sustained love & harmony-Based on the spiritual & inner Enneagram. Virginia: McLean.

Abstract:
The study examined the influence of Enneagram Personality types (enneatypes) and marital satisfaction among couples in Kiambu County, Kenya. The study was based on the Satir's human validation theory that connects couples intrapersonal dynamics to marital systems functioning. The study used a quasi-experimental time series A-B-A research design. The target population was married couples within 5-20 years of marriage from Kiambu County. Multi layered sampling involving purposeful and random sampling was used to select the sample. Priori power analysis was performed to determine the minimum sample size as 44 couples for experimental and control groups each, using free G*power 3.1 software. A sample of 115 couples was randomly assigned to experimental and control group where 58 out of the 115 couples were assigned to the experimental group and 57 to control groups. A short form of standardized 60 items free Enneagram Type Indicator Test and enneatype awareness and couple satisfaction index (CSI-16) questionnaire were used in identifying enneatypes, determining enneatype awareness and marital satisfaction for all the participants in pretest and posttests. Descriptive statistics and one way ANOVA tests were used in data analysis. The study found not significant means difference in marital satisfaction between the nine enneagram personality types suggesting that enneatypes did not significantly influence total marital satisfaction. The study further found significant mean difference in 13 out of 21 marital satisfaction sub-variables between the nine personality types indicating that enneatypes influenced various marital satisfaction sub-variables though largely without enneatype awareness. The findings may be significant in managing couples marital satisfaction through policy and psychotherapeutic treatment.