International Journal of Social Science & Economic Research
Submit Paper

Title:
AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE PERFORMANCE IN BURSA MALAYSIA

Authors:
Mohd Rashdan Sallehuddin, Rosli Mohd Saad, Nor Azrin Mohamad Rosli

|| ||

1Mohd Rashdan Sallehuddin, 2Rosli Mohd Saad, 3Nor Azrin Mohamad Rosli
1,2. School of Business Management, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia.
3. Agrobank Berhad, Penang, Malaysia.

MLA 8
Sallehuddin, Mohd Rashdan, et al. "AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE PERFORMANCE IN BURSA MALAYSIA." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 4, no. 9, Sept. 2019, pp. 6200-6214, ijsser.org/more2019.php?id=475. Accessed Sept. 2019.
APA
Sallehuddin, M., Saad, R., & Rosli, N. (2019, September). AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE PERFORMANCE IN BURSA MALAYSIA. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 4(9), 6200-6214. Retrieved from ijsser.org/more2019.php?id=475
Chicago
Sallehuddin, Mohd Rashdan, Rosli Mohd Saad, and Nor Azrin Mohamad Rosli. "AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE PERFORMANCE IN BURSA MALAYSIA." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 4, no. 9 (September 2019), 6200-6214. Accessed September, 2019. ijsser.org/more2019.php?id=475.

References

[1]. Abdullah, S. N. (2006). Board structure and ownership in Malaysia: The case of distressed listed a. companies. Corporate Governance, 6(5), 582-694.
[2]. Abdullah, S. N. (2004). Board composition, CEO duality and performance among Malaysian a. listed companies, Corporate Governance, 4(4), 47-61.
[3]. Abidin, Z. Z., Kamal, N. M., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Board structure and corporate performance in a. Malaysia. International Journal of Economics & Finance, 1(1), 150-164.
[4]. Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency a. problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative , 31(3), 377-397.
[5]. Aldamen, H., Duncan, K., Kelly, S., McNamara, R., & Nagel, S. (2012). Audit committee a. characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis. Accounting & Finance, 52(4), 971-1000.
[6]. Alhaji, I. A., & Alkali, M. (2012) Corporate governance and firm performance: A comparative a. analysis of two sectors of Malaysian listed companies. 2nd International Conference on Management, Langkawi, Kedah, Malaysia.
[7]. Al-Matari, E. M., Al-Swidi, A. K., Fadzil, F. H., & Al-Matari, Y. A. (2012). The Impact of board a. characteristics on Firm Performance: Evidence from Nonfinancial Listed Companies in Kuwaiti Stock Exchange. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 2(2), 310.
[8]. Baxter, P. (2010). Factors associated with the quality of audit committees. Pacific Accounting a. Review, 22(1), 57-74.
[9]. Beasley, M. S., & Salterio, S. E. (2001). The relationship between board characteristics and a. voluntary improvements in audit committee composition and experience. Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(4), 539-570.
[10]. Beiner, S., Drobetz, W., Schmid, F., & Zimmermann, H. (2004). Is board size an independent a. corporate governance mechanism? Kyklos, 57(3), 327-356.
[11]. Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (1999). The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm a. performance. The Business Lawyer, 921-963.
[12]. Bhagat, S., & Black, B.(2001). Non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm a. performance. The Journal of Corporation Law, 27(2), 231-274.
[13]. Black, B. S., Jang, H., & Kim, W. (2006). Does corporate governance predict firmsí market a. value? Evidence from Korea. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 22(2), 366-413.
[14]. Brennan, N. (2006). Boards of directors and firm performance: Is there an expectations gap?. a. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(6), 577-593.
[15]. Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, T. L., & Riley, R. A. (2002). Board characteristics and a. audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), 365-384.
[16]. Chan, K. C., & Li, J. (2008). Audit committee and firm value: Evidence on outside top a. executivesas expert-independent directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(1), 16-31.
[17]. Cheema, K. U. R., & Din, M. S. (2013). Impact of corporate governance on performance of a. firms: A case study of cement industry in Pakistan. Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 1(4), 44-46.
[18]. Chen, D. H., Fan, J. P., & Wong, T. J. (2004). Politically-connected CEOs, corporate governance a. and post-IPO performance of China's partially privatized firms. Chinese University of Hong Kong, Working Paper.
[19]. Chiang, H. T. (2005). An empirical study of corporate governance and corporate performance. a. Journal of American Academy of Business, 6(1), 95-101.
[20]. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P., & Lang, L. H. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and a. entrenchment effects on large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741-2771.
[21]. Coles, J. W., McWilliams, V. B., & Sen, N. (2001). An examination of the relationship of a. governance mechanisms to performance. Journal of Management, 27(1), 23-50.
[22]. Collier, P., & Gregory, A. (2000). Audit committee activity and agency costs. Journal of a. Accounting and Public Policy, 18(4), 311-332.
[23]. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings a. manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the sector. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1-36.
[24]. DeZoort, F. T., Hermanson, D. R., Archambeault, D. S., & Reed, S. A. (2002). Audit committee a. effectiveness: A synthesis of the empirical audit committee literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 21, 38-75.
[25]. Ehikioya, B. I. (2009). Corporate governance structure and firm performance in developing a. economies: Evidence from Nigeria. Corporate Governance, 9(3), 231-243.
[26]. Erickson, J., Park, Y. W., Reising, J., & Shin, H. H. (2005). Board composition and firm value a. under concentrated ownership: The Canadian evidence. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13(4), 387-410.
[27]. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and a. Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
[28]. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Board of directors as an endogenously determined a. institutions: A survey of the economic literature, Economic Policy Review: Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 9(1), 7-26.
[29]. Ho, S. S., & Shun Wong, K. (2001). A study of the relationship between corporate governance a. structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 10(2), 139-156.
[30]. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs a. and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
[31]. Judge, W. Q., Naoumova, I., & Koutzevol, N. (2003). Corporate governance and firm a. performance in Russia: An empirical study. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 385- 396.
[32]. Kalbers, L. P., & Fogarty, T. J. (1993). Audit committee effectiveness: an empirical investigation a. of the contribution of power: Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 12(1), 24-49.
[33]. Karamanou, I., & Vafeas, N. (2005). The association between corporate boards, audit a. committees and management earnings forecast: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(3), 453-486.
[34]. Klein, A. (2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics and earnings management. a. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33, 375-400.
[35]. Koh, P. S., Laplante, S. K., & Tong, Y. H. (2007). Accountability and value enhancement roles a. of corporate governance. Accounting & Finance, 47(2), 305-333.
[36]. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2002). Investor protection and a. corporate valuation, Journal of Finance, 57(3), 1147-1170.
[37]. Levrau, A., & Van den Berghe, L. A. (2007). Corporate governance and Board Effectiveness: a. beyond formalism. ICFAI Journal of Corporate Governance, 6(4), 58-85.
[38]. Lin, J. W., & Hwang, M. I. (2010). Audit quality, corporate governance and earnings a. management: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Auditing, 14(1), 57-77.
[39]. Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A model proposal for improved corporate governance. The a. Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59-77.
[40]. MacAvoy, P. W., & Millstein, I. M. (2004). The recurrent crisis in corporate governance. a. Stanford University Press.
[41]. Malaysian Business. (2012). 100 Malaysia's largest listed companies 2012/2013. Berita a. Publishing Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia.
[42]. Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance (2000), Malaysian Law Journal Sdn. Bhd., Malaysia.
[43]. McMullen, D. A. (1996). Audit committee performance: An investigation of the consequences a. associated with audit committees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15(1), 87-103.
[44]. Okpara, J. O. (2011). Corporate governance in a developing economy: Barriers, issues and a. implications for firms, Corporate Governance, 11(2), 184-199.
[45]. Ponnu, C. H. (2008). Corporate governance structures and the performance of Malaysian public- a. listed companies. International Review of Business Research, 4(2), 217-230.
[46]. Pugliese, A., & Wenstop, P. Z. (2007). Board members' contribution to strategic decision- a. making in small firms. Journal of Management & Governance, 11(4), 383-404.
[47]. Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (2007). Determinants of audit committee diligence. a. Accounting Horizons, 21(3), 265-279.
[48]. Ruin, J.E. (2001). Essentials of Corporate Management, Kuala Lumpur: MICG.
[49]. Sanda, A., Mikailu, S. A., & Garba, T. (2005). Corporate governance mechanism and firm a. financial performance in Nigeria. African Economic Research Consortium (AERC) Research Paper 149; Nairobi, Kenya.
[50]. Shakir, R. (2008). Board size, executive directors and property firm performance in Malaysia. a. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 14(1), 66-80.
[51]. Sharma, V., Naiker, V., & Lee, B. (2009). Determinants of audit committee meeting frequency: a. Evidence from a voluntary governance system. Accounting Horizons, 23(2), 245-263.
[52]. Sheikh, N. A., Wang, Z., & Khan, S. (2013). The impact of internal attributes of corporate a. governance on firm performance: Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 23(1), 38-55.
[53]. Shleifer, A., & Wolfenzon, D. (2002). Investor protection and equity markets. Journal of a. Financial Economics, 66(1), 3-27.
[54]. Short, H., & Keasey, K. (1999). Managerial ownership and the performance of firms: Evidence a. from the UK. Journal of Corporate Finance, 5(1), 79-101.
[55]. Shukeri, S. N., Shin, O., & Shaari, M. S. (2012). Does board of directors, characteristics affects a. firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian public-listed companies. International Business Research, 5(9), 35.
[56]. Tham, J. T. M., & Romuald, D. F. (2012). The impact of corporate governance mechanism and a. corporate performance: A study of listed companies in Malaysia. Journal for the Advancement of Science & Arts, 3(1), 31-45.
[57]. Vera-Munoz, S. C. (2005). Corporate governance reforms: Redefined expectations of audit a. committee independence: Evidence from NYSE on grey' area directors. Accounting Horizons, 7(1), 53-57.
[58]. Yeh, Y. H., Lee, T. S., & Ko, C. E. (2002). Corporate governance and rating system. Business a. Weekly.

Abstract:
Since last decade the corporate governance has been the focus of many researches worldwide. This stems come from the belief that the better governance of the firms lead to more healthy corporations. The current study will contribute to the growing literature in this field of study and mainly focusing on the impact of corporate governance on corporate performance among publiclisted companies in Malaysia. This paper aims to examine the impact of the relationship between corporate governance elements and company performance based on earning per share among top 100 public-listed companies in Malaysia. The study adopts by examines the annual reports from the year 2008 to 2012. Regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between company performance and independent variables of CG namely board size, board independence, audit committee size, audit committee independence and audit committee meeting frequency. Analysis found, the company performance is significant relationship only with audit committee size. In contrast, the corporate performance is insignificant with board size, board independence, audit committee independence and audit committee meeting frequency. The result of this study could provide insight for the evidence to relevant regulatory bodies in Malaysia to look further on the effectiveness on the code of corporate governance among public-listed companies in Malaysia.