International Journal of Social Science & Economic Research
Submit Paper

Title:
THE CONCEPTION OF INNOVATION ON THE CENTRAL THEORETICAL HUBS OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT

Authors:
Charis Vlados

|| ||

Charis Vlados
Department of Economics, Democritus University of Thrace, Komotini, Greece

MLA 8
Vlados, Charis. "THE CONCEPTION OF INNOVATION ON THE CENTRAL THEORETICAL HUBS OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 4, no. 11, Nov. 2019, pp. 6703-6731, ijsser.org/more2019.php?id=512. Accessed Nov. 2019.
APA
Vlados, C. (2019, November). THE CONCEPTION OF INNOVATION ON THE CENTRAL THEORETICAL HUBS OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 4(11), 6703-6731. Retrieved from ijsser.org/more2019.php?id=512
Chicago
Vlados, Charis. "THE CONCEPTION OF INNOVATION ON THE CENTRAL THEORETICAL HUBS OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 4, no. 11 (November 2019), 6703-6731. Accessed November, 2019. ijsser.org/more2019.php?id=512.

References
[1]. Acs, Z. J., Stam, E., Audretsch, D. B., & O'Connor, A. (2017). The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8
[2]. Allen, W. R. (1970). Modern defenders of mercantilist theory. History of Political Economy, 2(2), 381-397. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2-2-381
[3]. Aydalot, P. (Ed.). (1984). Crise et espace. Paris: Economica.
[4]. Barnett, V. (1998). Kondratiev and the dynamics of economic development: Long cycles and industrial growth in historical context. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26327-1
[5]. Bodrozic, Z., & Adler, P. S. (2018). The evolution of management models: A neo-schumpeterian theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(1), 85-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217704811
[6]. Czarnitzki, D., & Kraft, K. (2012). Spillovers of innovation activities and their profitability. Oxford Economic Papers, 64(2), 302-322. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpr020
[7]. Engels, F. (1873). Dialektik der natur (dialectics of nature) (Moscow, Progress Publishers, 1972 edition).
[8]. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers.
[9]. Freeman, C. (1995). The "national system of innovation" in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-24.
[10]. Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1994). Work for all or mass unemployment?: Computerised technical change into the twenty-first century. London: Pinter.
[11]. Goodacre, H. (2010). Technological progress and economic analysis from Petty to Smith. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17(5), 1149-1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2010.522240
[12]. Hanusch, H., & Pyka, A. (2007). Principles of Neo-Schumpeterian economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(2), 275-289. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bel018
[13]. Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.
[14]. Johnson, E. A. J. (1942). Review of the politics of mercantilism. The American Economic Review, 32(3), 564-566.
[15]. Kohler, J. (2012). A comparison of the neo-Schumpeterian theory of Kondratiev waves and the multi-level perspective on transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 3, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2012.04.001
[16]. Kondratieff, N. D., & Stolper, W. F. (1935). The long waves in economic life. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 17(6), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928486
[17]. Lim, K. F. (2017). International division of labor. In D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu, & R. A. Marston (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment and Technology (pp. 1-4). Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg1035
[18]. Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National Innovation Systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
[19]. Marx, K. (1887). Capital: A critique of political economy Volume I: Book one: The process of production of capital (Source: First English edition of 1887 (4th German edition changes included as indicated) with some modernisation of spelling; Publisher: Progress Publishers, Moscow, USSR; Translated: Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling, edited by Frederick Engels; Transcribed: Zodiac, Hinrich Kuhls, Allan Thurrott, Bill McDorman, Bert Schultz and Martha Gimenez (1995-1996); Proofed: and corrected by Andy Blunden and Chris Clayton (2008), Mark Harris (2010).). Moscow, USSR: Progress Publishers.
[20]. Marx, K. (1955). The poverty of philosophy: Answer to the philosophy of poverty by M. Proudhon (Source: Progress Publishers, 1955; Translated: from the French by the Institute of Marxism-Leninism, 1955; Transcribed: by Zodiac for Marx/Engels Internet Archive (marxists.org) 1999; Proofed: and corrected by Matthew Carmody, 2009). Moscow, USSR: Progress Publishers.
[21]. Marx, K. (1959). Capital: A critique of political economy Volume III: The process of capitalist production as a Whole (Source: Institute of Marxism-Leninism, USSR, 1959; On-Line Version: Marx.org 1996, Marxists.org 1999; Transcribed: in 1996 by Hinrich Kuhls, Dave Walters and Zodiac, and by Tim Delaney and M. Griffin in 1999; HTML Markup: Zodiac 1996, Tim Delaney and M. Griffin in 1999; Proofed and Corrected: by Chris Clayton 2006-7, Mark Harris 2010.). Institute of Marxism-Leninism, USSR.
[22]. Marx, K. (1973). Outlines of the critique of political economy (Source: Penguin 1973; Translated by: Martin Nicolaus; Scanned by: Tim Delaney, 1997; HTML Mark-up: Andy Blunden, 2002.). Penguin.
[23]. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1969). Manifesto of the Communist Party (Source: Marx/Engels Selected Works, Vol. One, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1969, pp. 98-137; Transcribed: by Zodiac and Brian Baggins; Proofed: and corrected against 1888 English Edition by Andy Blunden 2004; Copyleft: Marxists Internet Archive (marxists.org) 1987, 2000, 2010.). Moscow, USSR: Progress Publishers.
[24]. Metcalfe, S. (1995). The economic foundations of technology policy: Equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. In P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change (pp. 409-512). Oxford, UK; Cambridge, US: Blackwell Publishers.
[25]. Moore, J. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-86.
[26]. Musto, M. (2010). Revisiting Marx's concept of alienation. Socialism and Democracy, 24(3), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2010.544075
[27]. Nelson, R. (1993). National innovation systems. A comparative analysis. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[28]. Nelson, R. (2018). Economics from an evolutionary perspective. In R. Nelson (Ed.), Modern evolutionary economics: An overview (pp. 1-34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108661928.001
[29]. Nelson, R., Dosi, G., Helfat, C., Winter, S., Pyka, A., Saviotti, P., ... Dopfer, K. (2018). Modern evolutionary economics: An overview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108661928
[30]. OECD. (1997). National innovation systems. Paris: OECD Publications.
[31]. Parisot, X. (2013). Metaphor in organizational theory, the business ecosystem case. Volume: 22th AIMS International Conference. Presented at the International Academy of Strategic Management, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
[32]. Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994). The nature and economic importance of national innovation systems. STI Review, 14, 9-32.
[33]. Perez, C. (1983). Structural change and assimilation of new technologies in the economic and social systems. Futures, 15(5), 357-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(83)90050-2
[34]. Perez, C. (2010). Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep051
[35]. Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1
[36]. Porter, M. (Ed.). (1998). Rethinking competition: Creating tomorrow's advantages. In R. Gibson, Rethinking the future: Rethinking business principles, competition, control & complexity, leadership, markets and the world (pp. 48-61). London: Nicholas Brealey.
[37]. Rahmeyer, F. (2016). Schumpeter, Marshall, and Neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary economics. Jahrbucher Fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik, 233(1), 39-64. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2013-0105
[38]. Rey, P. J. (2012). Alienation, exploitation, and social media. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(4), 399-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211429367
[39]. Robinson, J., & Eatwell, J. (1973). An introduction to modern economics. Maidenhead, UK: McHraw-Hill.
[40]. Roth, R. (2010). Marx on technical change in the critical edition. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17(5), 1223-1251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2010.522239
[41]. Schumacher, R. (2012). Adam Smith's theory of absolute advantage and the use of doxography in the history of economics. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 5(2), 54-80. https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v5i2.105
[42]. Schumpeter, J. (1928). The instability of capitalism. The Economic Journal, 38(151), 361-386. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224315
[43]. Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Reprint Edition: New Brunswick, N.J, Transaction Books, 1983, Social science classics series; R. Opie, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[44]. Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business cycles: A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. New York; London: McGraw-Hill.
[45]. Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy (Edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003). New York; London: Harper & Brothers.
[46]. Smith, A. (2005a). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (First published: 1776). An electronic classics series publication. Jim Manis, Editor.
[47]. Smith, A. (2005b). The theory of moral sentiments (First published: 1790). Salvio Marcelo Soares. Published by Metalibri.
[48]. Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York; London: Harper.
[49]. Veltz, P. (2008). Le nouveau monde industriel. Paris: Gallimard.
[50]. Vlados, Ch. (2006). The dynamics of globalization and the enterprises in Greece. Athens: Kritiki Publications. [Book published in Greek under the title: ? dynamics of globalization and business in Greece]
[51]. Vlados, Ch. (2017). Global crisis, innovation and change management: The Stra.Tech.Man perspective. Athens: Kritiki Publications. [Book published in Greek under the title: World crisis, innovation and change management: ? optical STRA.TECH.MAN]
[52]. Vlados, Ch. (2019a). Notes on the main analytical insufficiencies of the Marxist theoretical tradition for the comprehension of the contemporary global economy. Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 6(3), 132-155. https://doi.org/10.1453/jest.v6i3.1942
[53]. Vlados, Ch. (2019b). Porter's diamond approaches and the competitiveness web. International Journal of Business Administration, 10(5), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijba.v10n5p33
[54]. Vlados, Ch, & Chatzinikolaou, D. (2019a). Business ecosystems policy in Stra.Tech.Man terms: The case of the Eastern Macedonia and Thrace region. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 15(3), 163-197.
[55]. Vlados, Ch, & Chatzinikolaou, D. (2019b). Crisis, institutional innovation and change management: Thoughts from the Greek case. Journal of Economics and Political Economy, 6(1), 58-77. https://doi.org/10.1453/jepe.v6i1.1854
[56]. Vlados, Ch, & Chatzinikolaou, D. (2019c). Methodological redirections for an evolutionary approach of the external business environment. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 9(2), 25-46. https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v9n2p25
[57]. Vlados, Ch, Deniozos, N., & Chatzinikolaou, D. (2019). Global crisis and restructuring: Theory, analysis, and the case of Greece. Retrieved from http://books.ksplibrary.org/978-605-7602-89-3/

Abstract:
Innovation seems to be one of the most critical concepts in economics discourse nowadays. However, the contribution of some of the central theoretical hubs to economic science concerning innovation is not always exploited systematically. Therefore, this article aims to present and analyze how some of the most prominent economists in the course of history have approached the issue, as well as to attempt to synthesize this knowledge. In particular, we examine the theoretical contributions of Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and Joseph Schumpeter, as well as some relatively recent theoretical approaches to innovation that appear to draw on the work of these theorists. The central conclusion of this study is that the conceptualization of innovation, either explicitly or implicitly, has deep theoretical roots while, in particular, the finding of the dynamic nature of the phenomenon of innovation seems to have been approached by most of the critical hubs of economic analysis.