International Journal of Social Science & Economic Research
Submit Paper

Title:
ETHICAL NOTION REVOLVING AROUND NEW REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY IN INDIA

Authors:
Jyoti Saini

|| ||

Jyoti Saini
Phd Scholar, Department of Sociology Delhi School of Economics, Delhi University

MLA 8
Saini, Jyoti. "ETHICAL NOTION REVOLVING AROUND NEW REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY IN INDIA." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 4, no. 2, Feb. 2019, pp. 1035-1055, ijsser.org/more2019.php?id=78. Accessed Feb. 2019.
APA
Saini, J. (2019, February). ETHICAL NOTION REVOLVING AROUND NEW REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY IN INDIA. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 4(2), 1035-1055. Retrieved from ijsser.org/more2019.php?id=78
Chicago
Saini, Jyoti. "ETHICAL NOTION REVOLVING AROUND NEW REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY IN INDIA." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 4, no. 2 (February 2019), 1035-1055. Accessed February, 2019. ijsser.org/more2019.php?id=78.

References
[1]. Archer Margaret S (2003). "Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation". Cambridge University Press. United Kingdom.
[2]. Barner Barry (2000). "Understanding Agency; Social Theory and Responsible Action." Sage Publication New Delhi.
[3]. Bhradwaj Aditya (2016) .Conception: Infertility and Procreative Technologies in India. Orient Blackswan Private Limited, Delhi.
[4]. Briggs Laura (2010). Reproductive Technology: Of Labor and Markets. Feminist Studies, 36(2). 359-374.
[5]. Cahn Naomi (2013), "The New Kinship, constructing donor-conceived families". New York University Press, New York.
[6]. Carmeli Daphana Birenbum and Inhorn Marcia C. (2009). Masculinity and Marginality: Palestine Men's struggle with Infertility in Israel and Lebanon. Journal of Middle East Women's Studies 5(2). 23-52.
[7]. Cussins Charis (1998). Producing Reproduction: Techniques of Normalization and Naturalization in Infertility Clinics. In (Ed.)Sarah Franklin & Helena Ragone Reproducing Reproduction :Kinship, Power and Technological Innovation (66 -101). University of Pennsylvania Press. U.S.A
[8]. Donchin Anne (1986). The future of Mothering: Reproductive Technology and Feminist Theory. Hyptia 1(2). 121-138.
[9]. Franklin Sarah (1998), "Making Miracles: Scientific Progress and the Facts of Life". In (Ed.) Sarah Franklin and
[10]. Helena Ragone Reproducing Reproduction; Kinship, Power and Technological Innovation (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.)
[11]. George Annie (2002). Embodying identity through heterosexual sexuality - newly married adolescent women in India. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 4(2). 207-222.
[12]. Gaard Greta (2010). Reproductive Technology, or Reproductive Justice ? : An Ecofeminist, Environmental Justice Perspective on the Rhetoric Choice. Ethics and Environment 15(2). 103-129.
[13]. Harris John (1998). Rights and Reproductive Choice. In (Ed.) Harris John and Holm Soren. The Future of Human Reproduction; Ethics, Choice, and Regulation. (Clarendon Press. Oxford)
[14]. Hirschman Elizabeth C. (1991). Babies for sale: Market ethics and the new reproductive technologies. Journal of Consumer Affairs. 25(2). 358-390.
[15]. Jenkins Richard (1992). Pierre Bourdieu. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group London and New York. Kane Anne E (1996). The centrality of culture in social theory, fundamental clues from Weber and Durkheim. In (Ed.)
[16]. Stephen P Turner Social theory and Sociology, The classics and Beyond (161-180). Blackwell Publishers. Oxford U.K.
[17]. Krolokke Charlotte (2014), " Eggs and Euros: A feminist perspective on reproductive travel from Denmark to Spain". International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics. Vol 7(2). 144-163.
[18]. Lacey Huge (1999). Is science value free ?; Values and scientific understanding. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group London and New York.
[19]. Latour Bruno (1993). We have never being modern. Harvard University Press. Cambridge Massachusetts Leff Joan Raphel (2010). The gift of gametes-unconscious motivation, commodification and problematic of genealogy. Feminist Review. 94. 117-137.
[20]. Parkin David (1985). Reason, emotion and the embodiment of power. In (Ed) Joanna Overing Reason and Morality (134-149).Tavisock Publications London and New York
[21]. Quiroga Seline Szkupinski (2007). Blood is thicker than water : Policing donor insemination and the reproduction of the whiteness. Hypatia 22(2). 143-161.
[22]. Ragone Helena (1996). Chasing the blood tie: surrogate mothers, adoptive mothers and fathers. American ethnologist. 23(2). 352-365
[23]. Rao Mohan (2016). The globalization of reproduction in India. From population control to surrogacy. In ed volume by Sarah hodges and Mohan Rao, Public Health and Private Wealth, stem cells, surrogates and other strategic bodies. Oxford Publication. New Delhi.
[24]. Have Henk AMJ ten (1995). Medical Tehnology Assesment & Ethics Ambivalent Relations. Hasting Center Report. Vol 25 (5). 13-19.
[25]. Ryan Maurya A. (2009). The introduction of assisted reproductive technologies in the "developing world": A test case for evolving methodologies in feminist Bioethics. Signs. 34(4). 805-825.
[26]. Sarojini Nadimpally, Vrinda Marwah and Anjali Shenoi (2011). Globalization of Birth Markets: A case study of assisted reproductive technologies in India. 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-7-27.
[27]. Shildrick Margrit (1997). Leaky bodies and boundaries, feminism, postmodernism and bioethics. Routledge London and New York.
[28]. Shore Cris, Abrahams R.G et al (1992). Virgin births and sterile debates: Anthropology and the new reproductive technologies. Current Anthropology. 33(3). 295-314.

Abstract:
This paper discusses the ethical notion revolving around new reproductive technology in India. Present study is based on fieldwork based in Delhi, which includes interviews with doctors and patients.