IJSSER

Title: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND ITS IMPACT ON EMPLOYEES PRODUCTIVITY
Authors: Dr. Cross Ogohi Daniel
\|\| \|\|
Dr. Cross Ogohi Daniel Departments of Public Administration/ Banking and Finance, Nile University of Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria
MLA 8 Daniel, Dr. Cross Ogohi. "PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND ITS IMPACT ON EMPLOYEES PRODUCTIVITY." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 4, no. 2, Feb. 2019, pp. 1151-1160, ijsser.org/more2019.php?id=86. Accessed Feb. 2019. APA Daniel, D. (2019, February). PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND ITS IMPACT ON EMPLOYEES PRODUCTIVITY. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 4(2), 1151-1160. Retrieved from ijsser.org/more2019.php?id=86 Chicago Daniel, Dr. Cross Ogohi. "PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND ITS IMPACT ON EMPLOYEES PRODUCTIVITY." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 4, no. 2 (February 2019), 1151-1160. Accessed February, 2019. ijsser.org/more2019.php?id=86.
References [1]. Armstrong, M. 2001. A handbook of human resource management park t i cue. 8t h ed. London: Kogan Page [2]. Boswell, M., & Benson, J. (2000).Employee Satisfaction with Performance appraisal and appraisers: the role of perceived appraisal use. Journal of human resource development11(3):283-299 [3]. Cook, J., and Crossman, A. (2004). Satisfaction with performance appraisal systems: A study of role perceptions. Journal of managerial psychology, 19(5), 526-541 [4]. Greenberg, J. (1986), "Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 71 pp.340-2. [5]. Grubb, T. (2007). "Performance Appraisal Reappraised: It's Not All Positive." Journal of Human Resource EducationVol. 1, (No. 1,): 1-22. [6]. Kacmar, K.M., Bozeman, D.P., Carison, D.S., Anthony, W.P. (1999), "An examination of the perceptions of organizational politics model: replication and extension", Human Relations, Vol. 52 pp.383-416. [7]. Kane, J.S., & Lawler, E.E. (2009), "Performance appraisal effectiveness: its assessment and determinants", in Staw, B.M. (Eds),Research in Organizational Behavior, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, Vol. 1 pp.425-78. [8]. Kuvaas, B. (2006), "Performance appraisal satisfaction and employee outcomes: mediating and moderating roles of work motivation", International Journal of Human Resource Management Vol. 17 (3), pp. 504-522. [9]. Mackey, K. & Johnson, G. (2000).The Strategic Management of Human Resources in New Zealand. Auckland: Irwin/McGraw-Hill. [10]. Mani, B. (2002). Performance appraisal systems, productivity, and motivation: A case study. International Journal of Human Resource Management 19: 141-159. [11]. Nurse, L. (2005).Performance appraisal, employee development and organizational Justice: Exploring the linkages. International Journal of Human Resource Management16 (7): 1176-1194. [12]. Rao, H. 1994. The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895-1912. Strategic management Journal, 15, 29-44 [13]. Rudman, R. (2003). Performance planning & review: 2nd edition. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Urwin Academic [14]. Tyson, S. & York, A. (2000). Essentials of Human Resources Management. 4th Edition. Oxford: Jordan Hill.
Abstract: The Performance appraisal is one of the most significant human resource management customs as it yields critical decisions essential to various human resource programs and outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to examine performance appraisal and its impact on employee's productivity in an organization context. In this rapid-cycle economy, business leaders know that having a high-performing lobour force is essential for growth and survival. They know that a highly engaged lobour force can upsurge innovation, productivity, and bottom-line performance, while decreasing costs related to leasing and retention in highly competitive talent markets. The work environment and job characteristics have a differential effect on employee duties. However, a growing group of best-in-class companies say they are gaining for its competitive advantage through establishing metrics and practices to effectively quantify and improve the impact of their duties initiatives on overall organisational performance. The survey found that many banks find it challenging to measure performance appraisal and tie its impact to financial results. A significant gap appeared between the views of executive managers and middle managers in this area. Top executives seemed much more optimistic about the levels of employee productivity in their organisations, making them seem out of touch with middle management's sense of their front line workers' productivity. The Research is to getting Connection towards employee's productivity to their performance appraisal requires considerable effort and top management focus to a large degree, with enormous opportunity available to utilize for better function of their organizations.

IJSSER is Member of