IJSSER

Title: ARGUMENTS FOR RETENTION OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT
Authors: Ranjana Tiwari and Dr. Rakesh Kumar
\|\| \|\|
Ranjana Tiwari1 and Dr. Rakesh Kumar2 Research scholar, Himalayan Garhwal University Research Guide
MLA 8 Tiwari, Ranjana. "ARGUMENTS FOR RETENTION OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 5, no. 8, Aug. 2020, pp. 2413-2416, ijsser.org/more2020.php?id=167. Accessed Aug. 2020. APA 6 Tiwari, R. (2020, August). ARGUMENTS FOR RETENTION OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 5(8), 2413-2416. Retrieved from ijsser.org/more2020.php?id=167 Chicago Tiwari, Ranjana. "ARGUMENTS FOR RETENTION OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 5, no. 8 (August 2020), 2413-2416. Accessed August, 2020. ijsser.org/more2020.php?id=167.
References
Abstract: Capital punishment is the practice of executing someone as punishment for a specific crime after a proper legal trial. It can only be a used by a state, so when non-state organizations speak of having 'executed' a person they have actually committed a murder. It is usually only used as punishment for particularly serious types of murder, but in some countries treason , types of fraud, adultery and rape are capital crimes. The phrase 'capital punishment' comes from the Latin word for the head. A 'corporal' punishment such as flogging, takes its name from the Latin word for the body.

IJSSER is Member of