IJSSER

Title: PROSPECT THEORY REVISITED: INVESTIGATING THE APPLICABILITY OF A REVISED VALUE FUNCTION ON DECISIONS THAT BENEFIT THE SELF OR OTHERS
Authors: John Leddo and Anchita Shukla
\|\| \|\|
John Leddo and Anchita Shukla MyEdMaster, LLC John Leddo is the director of research at MyEdMaster, LLC
MLA 8 Leddo, John, and Anchita Shukla. "PROSPECT THEORY REVISITED: INVESTIGATING THE APPLICABILITY OF A REVISED VALUE FUNCTION ON DECISIONS THAT BENEFIT THE SELF OR OTHERS." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 5, no. 9, Sept. 2020, pp. 2672-2684, doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2020.v05i09.018. Accessed Sept. 2020. APA 6 Leddo, J., & Shukla, A. (2020, September). PROSPECT THEORY REVISITED: INVESTIGATING THE APPLICABILITY OF A REVISED VALUE FUNCTION ON DECISIONS THAT BENEFIT THE SELF OR OTHERS. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 5(9), 2672-2684. doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2020.v05i09.018 Chicago Leddo, John, and Anchita Shukla. "PROSPECT THEORY REVISITED: INVESTIGATING THE APPLICABILITY OF A REVISED VALUE FUNCTION ON DECISIONS THAT BENEFIT THE SELF OR OTHERS." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 5, no. 9 (September 2020), 2672-2684. Accessed September, 2020. doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2020.v05i09.018.
References [1]. Alghalith, M., Floros, C., & Dukharan, M. (2012). Testing dominant theories and assumptions in behavioral finance. Proquest. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1014252017/94778EE9FA05455CPQ/4?accountid=34939 [2]. Beisswanger, A. H., Stone, E. R., Hupp, J. M., & Allgaier, L. (2003). Risk taking in relationships: Differences in deciding for oneself versus for a friend. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 121–135. [3]. Fernandez-Duque, D., & Wifall, T. (2007). Actor/observer asymmetry in risky decision making. [4]. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 1-8. [5]. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.) (2002). Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press. [6]. Jones, B.D. (2001). Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance. London and Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. [7]. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-91. [8]. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.) (2000). Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [9]. Leddo, J., Jayanti, A. & Duan, I. (2019). Prospect Theory Revisited: Incorporating Decision Maker's Goals into the Value Function. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, 4(10), 6619-6640. [10]. Nwogugu, M. (2005). Towards multi-factor models of decision making and risk: A critique of Prospect Theory and Related Approaches, part I. The Journal of Risk Finance, 6, 2. pp. 160-162. [11]. Patel, K & Leddo, J. (2016). “Spend or Save?” Decisions Made by Teens on Behalf of Self or Others. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4), 274-277. [12]. Riabacke, A. (2006). Managerial Decision Making Under Risk and Uncertainty. IAENG International Journal of Computer Science, Retrieved [13]. from http://www.iaeng.org/IJCS/issues_v32/issue_4/IJCS_32_4_12.pdf [14]. Small, D. A., Loewenstein, G., & Slovic, P. (2007). Sympathy and callousness: Affect and deliberations in donation decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 143–153. [15]. Stone, E. R., Yates, A. J., & Caruthers, A. S. (2002). Risk taking in decision making for others versus the self. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1797–1824. [16]. Weyland, K. (1996). Risk Taking in Latin American Economic Restructuring: Lessons from Prospect Theory. International Studies Quarterly, 40(2), 185-207. [17]. Weyland, K. (2006). Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Abstract: Prospect Theory (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979) is a highly influential theory that predicts decision making when people are confronted with choices involving gains or losses with different degrees of uncertainty. Prospect Theory argues that people are generally risk averse when it comes to seeking gains and risk seeking when it comes to seeking losses. Leddo et al. (2019) noted that the original formalization of Prospect Theory did not take into account people’s goals. They argued that people would be willing to take risks to achieve goals but become more risk averse once those goals are achieved, and they would become risk averse when confronted with losses in order to avoid a highly negative outcome but become more risk seeking to negate the negative outcome once it occurred. Leddo et al.'s research confirmed this hypothesis, leading to a revision of Prospect Theory's value function. The present research investigates whether the same revised value function can predict recommendations people make on behalf of others in addition to decisions made on behalf of oneself. 80 high school students were presented with scenarios requiring a choice of what standardized test to take to achieve or avoid losing admission to colleges. Gain scenarios depicted students either at or below a score needed to gain acceptance to a dream school. Loss scenarios depicted students either above or at a score that would cause them to lose out on college admission. In half the scenarios, students had to decide which standardized test they would take; in the other half, students had to decide which standardized test to recommend to a friend. Results showed that students made recommendations to their friends that were virtually identical to the decisions they made for themselves. The decisions themselves were consistent with predictions made by Leddo et al.'s (2019) revised value function, namely that high schoolers were more risk seeking when existing test scores were below the requirements of dream colleges than they were when existing scores were at the requirements and that they were more risk averse when existing test scores were in danger of falling to a level that would eliminate chances for getting into college than there were when scores had fallen to the level that negates chances of getting into college

IJSSER is Member of