IJSSER

Title: METAPHORIC UTTERANCE IN THE MAENGKET VERSE AS A REFLECTION OF RATIONAL MODE OF ETHNIC GROUP OF TONSEA IN NORTH MINAHASA: ANTHRO-LINGUISTIC STUDIES
Authors: Rosalina Rolany Rambing
\|\| \|\|
Rosalina Rolany Rambing Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado, North Sulawesi
MLA 8 Rambing, Rosalina Rolany. "METAPHORIC UTTERANCE IN THE MAENGKET VERSE AS A REFLECTION OF RATIONAL MODE OF ETHNIC GROUP OF TONSEA IN NORTH MINAHASA: ANTHRO-LINGUISTIC STUDIES." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 5, no. 11, Nov. 2020, pp. 3625-3639, doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2020.v05i11.020. Accessed Nov. 2020. APA 6 Rambing, R. (2020, November). METAPHORIC UTTERANCE IN THE MAENGKET VERSE AS A REFLECTION OF RATIONAL MODE OF ETHNIC GROUP OF TONSEA IN NORTH MINAHASA: ANTHRO-LINGUISTIC STUDIES. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 5(11), 3625-3639. doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2020.v05i11.020 Chicago Rambing, Rosalina Rolany. "METAPHORIC UTTERANCE IN THE MAENGKET VERSE AS A REFLECTION OF RATIONAL MODE OF ETHNIC GROUP OF TONSEA IN NORTH MINAHASA: ANTHRO-LINGUISTIC STUDIES." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 5, no. 11 (November 2020), 3625-3639. Accessed November, 2020. doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2020.v05i11.020.
References [1]. Djawanai, S. (2011). Sumbangan Etnolinguistik Bagi Kemanusiaan.Makalah: disajikan pada Program Pascasarjana Bidang Etnolinguistik, Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado. [2]. Eilers, F.J. (1995). Berkomunikasi Antara Budaya. Terj.J.Tondowidjojo. Ende: Nusah Indah. Djajasudarma, F. (1977). Nilai Budaya dalam Ungkapan dan Peribahasa Sunda. Jakarta: Pusat [3]. Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. [4]. Koentjaraningrat. (2005). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta: Bhineka Cipta [5]. Mamita,R.dan Oktavianus.(2008). Perilaku Berbahasa Masyarakat Minangkabau dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pemakaian Ungkapan Sebagai Media Pendidikan Informal Keluarga.Linguistik Indonesia.Jurnal Ilmiah MLI. Jakarta. N0.2. Tahun ke -26. [6]. Najoan, A., Rembang, M. , and Mulyono, H. 2017.Makna Pesan komunikasi Tradisional Tarian Maengket: Studi Pada Sanggar-Sanggar Seni Kitawaya. Manado e-journal “Acta Diurna” Volume VI. No. 1 [7]. Panggabean, M. Ed. 1981. Bahasa Pengaruh dan Peranannya. Jakarta: PT Gramedia. Robins, R. W. 1992. Pengantar Linguistik. Jakarta: ILDEP. [8]. Saussure, F. 1988. Pengantar Linguistik Umum. Edisi Ind. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press. Sapir, E. 1921.Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York:Harcourt, Brace and Company. [9]. Spradley, J. P. 1979. The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [10]. Sudaryat, Y. 2009. Makna Dalam Wacana. Prinsip-Prinsip Semantik dan Pragmatik. Bandung.Yrama Widya. [11]. Titus Loho. Nico Rau. 2010. Teks Lagu dan Sastra Tari Maengket dan Koreografi.Tomohon
Abstract: This research, regarding on Metaphoric Utterance in the Maengket Verse as A Reflection of Rational Mode of Ethnic Group of Tonsea in the North Minahasa aims to: (1) identify and classify metaphoric utterance in the Maengket verse as a reflection of rational mode of ethnic group of Tonsea in North Minahasa; and, further, (2) explain culturally metaphoric utterance in the Maengket poem as a reflection of rational mode of ethic group of Tonsea in North Minahasa. Methodologically, this employed explanatory-descriptive method. Based on data obtained, it, then, was analyzed and explained in terms of metaphoric utterance used as cultural symbols, arguing significance of such language. This given analysis is domain established to state categorical system of cultural symbols having semantic relation. Accordingly, it aimed to identify category of authentic and achieved an insight concerning on culture from a group of society being observed. The concept of analysis in the metaphoric utterance within verse includes words, phrases, clauses, discourses depicting from Maengket dance; and, subsequently, anthropologicallinguistic analysis by the aim to scientifically examine and investigate on the relation of language and socio-cultural aspects based on ethnicity (Djawanai, 2011). As a result, this research found that while farmers harvested rice, they, at first occasion, commenced praising to the supreme and mighty God. In addition, during harvest time, farmers did not only harvest by themselves, but also require assistance from other farmers. They cooperatively worked altogether, or gotongroyong (volunteerism) until they finished their harvesting. Also, the principle of cooperation was seen from the third type of in the verse of maramba wale weru, or ‘new house’. In such verse, it explicitly discussed materials used in establishing house and its interiors. To get such materials, it thus required aid from others. Under mutually assisting and cooperative system among local residents, gotong-royong, or volunteerism, was emerged, famously so called as mapalus.

IJSSER is Member of