International Journal of Social Science & Economic Research
Submit Paper

Title:
A MOUNTAIN CULTURE IN JEOPARDY: AN ANALYSIS OF A FAULTY FOREST POLICY WHICH IS AFFECTING THE CULTURE AND BIODIVERSITY OF A TRIBAL POPULATION IN WESTERN HIMALAYAS

Authors:
Dr. Syed Aiman Raza

|| ||

Dr. Syed Aiman Raza
Assistant professor, Department of Anthropology, Shia P.G. College, Lucknow

MLA 8
Raza, Dr. Syed Aiman. "A MOUNTAIN CULTURE IN JEOPARDY: AN ANALYSIS OF A FAULTY FOREST POLICY WHICH IS AFFECTING THE CULTURE AND BIODIVERSITY OF A TRIBAL POPULATION IN WESTERN HIMALAYAS." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 5, no. 12, December 2020, pp. 3980-3989, doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2020.v05i12.019. Accessed December 2020.
APA 6
Raza, D. (2020, December). A MOUNTAIN CULTURE IN JEOPARDY: AN ANALYSIS OF A FAULTY FOREST POLICY WHICH IS AFFECTING THE CULTURE AND BIODIVERSITY OF A TRIBAL POPULATION IN WESTERN HIMALAYAS. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 5(12), 3980-3989. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2020.v05i12.019
Chicago
Raza, D. "A MOUNTAIN CULTURE IN JEOPARDY: AN ANALYSIS OF A FAULTY FOREST POLICY WHICH IS AFFECTING THE CULTURE AND BIODIVERSITY OF A TRIBAL POPULATION IN WESTERN HIMALAYAS." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 5, no. 12 (December 2020), 3980-3989. Accessed December, 2020. https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2020.v05i12.019.

References

[1]. Bernard, A. and Spencer, J. (2002) ‘Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology’, New York and London: Routledge.
[2]. Blunt, M., Jeddere-Fisher, K., Mitra, K., and Sarin, M. (1999) ‘Forestry Project Impact Assesment Report’, Delhi: Government of Himachal Pradesh Forest Department, Shimla and DFID – India.
[3]. Fox, J.L., Nurbu, C., Bhatt, S. and Chandola, A. (1994) ‘Wildlife conservation and land-use changes in the Trans-Himalayan region of Ladakh, India’, Mountain Research and Development, Vol. 14, pp.39-60.
[4]. Goldstein, M.C. (1981) ‘High altitude Tibetan populations in the remote Himalaya: social transformation and its demographic, economic, and ecological consequences’, Mountain Research and Development, Vol. 1, pp.5-18.
[5]. Gouri, Sushil, M., Morrison, E. and Mayer, J. (2004) ‘Policy Influences on forest based livelihoods in H.P, India’, London: International Institute of Environment and Development.
[6]. Guha, R. (1989) ‘The Unquiet Woods: Ecological Change and Peasant Resistance in the Himalaya’, Berkeley: University of California Press.
[7]. Gupta, Hemant K. 2007. "Deforestation and Forest Cover Changes in the Himachal Himalaya, India." International
[8]. Jodha, N.S. (1992) ‘Common Property Resources: A Missing Dimension of Development Strategies’, World Bank Discussion Papers, Washington, D.C: No. 169.
[9]. UNCED (1992) Available at: http://www.sedac.ciesin.org/entri/texts/a21/ a21 -13 -mountain-developent.html.

Abstract:
Traditional mountain societies are characterised by their symbiotic relationship with nature. Living in harsh environments people have to rely on natural resources and on an array of practices which they have devised through trial and error during their inhabitancy through ages. Their holistic view of their ecosystem results in diversified and dynamic strategies that are well adapted to their natural environment. The emphasis is on diversification rather than homogenisation of landscape. But situation can reverse in the years to come and we can see a major upheaval in environment, transformation in the cultural milieu and economy thus leading to an unsustainable mode of life. The major cause of environmental degradation today is the unsustainable forest policy of the Himachal government which needs the attention of policy makers, if they want sustainable livelihoods for future generations. The paper analyses the faulty forest policy which is affecting the biodiversity and the culture of the Kinnaurese and reflects on why change is needed to transform the faulty policies not only in Himachal Pradesh but throughout the country.

IJSSER is Member of