IJSSER

Title: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS – THEIR REVOLUTION AND COMPARISON WITH DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY
Authors: Prof K Chandrashekhar
\|\| \|\|
Prof K Chandrashekhar Dept of Post Graduate Studies and Research in Political Science, Kuvempu University, Shakaraghatta577451 Shivamogga district
MLA 8 Chandrashekhar, Prof K. "FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS – THEIR REVOLUTION AND COMPARISON WITH DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 6, no. 3, Mar. 2021, pp. 1078-1084, doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2021.v06i03.022. Accessed Mar. 2021. APA 6 Chandrashekhar, P. (2021, March). FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS – THEIR REVOLUTION AND COMPARISON WITH DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 6(3), 1078-1084. doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2021.v06i03.022 Chicago Chandrashekhar, Prof K. "FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS – THEIR REVOLUTION AND COMPARISON WITH DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 6, no. 3 (March 2021), 1078-1084. Accessed March, 2021. doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2021.v06i03.022.
References [1]. Shankari Prasad Singh Dev and others versus Union of India - First Amendment Act declared as Intra Vires and constitution. AIR 1951 SC 458 1951RD(BR) 219-64 MLW 1005 1951 All India Law Journal page 740, Author - R G Chaturvedi III edition, Law Book Company, Allahabad, 1985 page no 740 [2]. The Constitutional 17th Amendment of 1964 declared as Ultra Vires. And the decision of a Shankari Prasad versus Union of India and Sajjan Singh versus Rajasthan were overruled (AIR 1965 SC 845 All India Law Journal page 740, Author - R G Chaturvedi III edition, Law Book Company, Allahabad, 1985 page no 38) [3]. Goloknath case, Constitutional 17th Amendment Act, 1964 was challenged in respect of Goloknath and others versus of state of Punjab case. AIR 1965 SC 845 All India Law Journal page 740, Author - R G Chaturvedi III edition, Law Book Company, Allahabad, 1985 [4]. Keshavananda Bharathi case AIR 1973 SC 1461 All India Law Journal page 740, Author - R G Chaturvedi III edition, Law Book Company, Allahabad, 1985 [5]. Minarva Mill versus Union of India, AIR 1980 SC 1787 All India Law Journal page 740, Author - R G Chaturvedi III edition, Law Book Company, Allahabad, 1985
Abstract: A study of the evolution of fundamental rights under the constitution of India can only be made by making a survey of the Constitutional History of India. The Britishers who set their feet on the Indian soil as traders ultimately colonised India and became its Imperial Master by 1858. The centralisation of power which started with the Regulating Act of 1773 found its culmination in the charter Act of 1833. The first war of Indian independence, historically dubbed as 'Sepoy Mutiny' represented the growing discontent against executive tyranny. This resulted in Queen Victoria’s proclamation of 1058 and from then started the era of decentralisation through a series of Government of India Acts like those of 1909 (Morley-Minto Reforms), and 1919 (Montagu-Chelms for Reforms) and Government of India Act of 1935 based upon the deliberations of three Round Table conferences and the Indian Independence Act of 1947.

IJSSER is Member of