Nandini Gupta
Modern School Barakhamba Road, Delhi, India

MLA 8
Gupta, Nandini. "(NO) WOMEN IN STEM: AN ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE TO THE SCIENTIFIC GLASS CEILING." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 8, no. 9, Sept. 2023, pp. 2978-2987, doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2023.v08i09.037. Accessed Sept. 2023.
APA 6
Gupta, N. (2023, September). (NO) WOMEN IN STEM: AN ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE TO THE SCIENTIFIC GLASS CEILING. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 8(9), 2978-2987. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2023.v08i09.037
Chicago
Gupta, Nandini. "(NO) WOMEN IN STEM: AN ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE TO THE SCIENTIFIC GLASS CEILING." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 8, no. 9 (September 2023), 2978-2987. Accessed September, 2023. https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2023.v08i09.037.

References

[1]. Aksnes, D. W., Rorstad, K., Piro, F., & Sivertsen, G. (2011). Are female researchers less cited? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), -. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.21486
[2]. Aschim, H. (2018, October 5). Three Women in Science Who Broke the Glass Ceiling. Harper's BAZAAR. https://www.harpersbazaar.com/culture/features/a23063189/women-in-science-glass-ceiling/
[3]. Bain, O., & Cummings, W. (2000). Academe's Glass Ceiling: Societal, Professional?Organizational, and Institutional Barriers to the Career Advancement of Academic Women. Comparative Education Review, 44(4), 3-4. JSTOR. 10.1086/447631
[4]. Beck, M. (2022). Critical feminist analysis of STEM mentoring programs: A meta-synthesis of the existing literature. Gender, Work & Organization. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwao.12729
[5]. Berkovitch, N. (1999). From Motherhood to Citizenship: Women’s Rights and International Organizations. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 30(6). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269868552_From_Motherhood_to_Citizenship_Women's_Rights_and_International_Organizations
[6]. Bertrand, M. (2018). The Glass Ceiling. https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/WP_2018-38.pdf
[7]. Borderias, C. (2012). Reconstrucion de la actividad femenina en Cataluña circa 1920. Historia Comtemporánea, 44.
[8]. Bradley, K. (2000). The Incorporation of Women into Higher Education: Paradoxical Outcomes? Sociology of Education, 73(1). JSTOR. 10.2307/2673196
[9]. Cammorosano, S. O. (1999). Condizione femminile e industrializzazione tra Otto e Novecento. Tra Fabbrica e società. Mondi operai nell’Italia del Novecento, 109-171.
[10]. Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (2000). The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv346t1h
[11]. Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114(4), JSTOR. 10.1086/595942
[12]. Das, A. (2023, March 10). Women in STEM: Empowering Young Women for the Future. The Financial Express. https://www.financialexpress.com/jobs/women-in-stem-empowering-young-women-for-the-future/3005011/
[13]. Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 1, 788-827.
[14]. The Equality Equation: Advancing the Participation of Women and Girls in STEM. (2020, November 23). World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/gender/publication/the-equality-equation-advancing-the-participation-of-women-and-girls-in-stem
[15]. Gender economics in macroeconomic research | Research and Innovation. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/research-and-innovation/en/projects/success-stories/all/gender-economics-macroeconomic-research
[16]. Georgieva, K., Alonso, C., Dabla-Norris, E., & Kochhar, K. (2019). The Economic Cost of Devaluing “Women's Work”. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2019/10/15/blog-the-economic-cost-of-devaluing-women-work
[17]. Glazer-Raymo, J. (1999). Women Who Lead: The Glass Ceiling Phenomenon. In Shattering Myths: Women in Academe (pp. 140-164). Johns Hopkins University Press.
[18]. Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). Gottfredson's Theory of Circumscription, Compromise, and Self-Creation. In Career Choice and Development. Duane Brown and Associates. http://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/2002CCtheory.pdf
[19]. Gottfredson, L. S. (2005). Applying Gottfredson's Theory of Circumscription and Compromise in Career Guidance and Counseling. In Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 71-100). John Wiley & Sons. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-21312-004
[20]. Holman, L., & Morandin, C. (2019). Researchers collaborate with same-gendered colleagues more often than expected across the life sciences. PLoS ONE, 14(4). PLoS.
[21]. Holman, L., Stuart-Fox, D., & Hauser, C. E. (2018). The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLoS Biology, 16(4). PLoS.
[22]. Kelly, G. P. (1989). Achieving Equality in Education- Prospects and Realities. International handbook of women’s education.
[23]. Krukowski, R. A., Jagsi, R., & Cardel, M. I. (2020). Academic Productivity Differences by Gender and Child Age in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine Faculty During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Women’s Health.
[24]. Makarova, E., Aeschlimann, B., & Herzog, W. (2019). The Gender Gap in STEM Fields: The Impact of the Gender Stereotype of Math and Science on Secondary Students' Career Aspirations. Frontiers Education, 4. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2019.00060/full
[25]. Nentwich, J. C., & Kelan, E. (2014). Towards a topology of ‘doing gender’: An analysis of empirical research and its challenges. Gender, Work and Organization, 21(2), ResearchGate. 10.1111/gwao.12025
[26]. Nosek, B., Banaji, M., & Greenwald, A. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math not = me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11287650_Math_male_me_female_therefore_math_me
[27]. Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National Differences in Gender-Science Stereotypes Predict National Sex Differences in Science and Math Achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0809921106
[28]. The Pursuit of Gender Equality: An Uphill Battle. (2017). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/publications/the-pursuit-of-gender-equality-9789264281318-en.htm
[29]. Ramon, E. J. (2020). Gender Equity in STEM in Higher Education (H. Kyoung Ro & F. Fernandez, Eds.). Routledge. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/eee1ae49-405f-4a98-ba2d-9b3050feebf0/doi.org/
[30]. Reskin, B. F., & Roos, P. A. (1990). Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women’s Inroads into Male Occupations. Temple University Press. https://tupress.temple.edu/books/job-queues-gender-queues
[31]. Squazzoni, F., Bravo, G., Grimaldo, F., Garc?a-Costa, D., Farjam, M., & Mehmani, B. (2021). Only Second-Class Tickets for Women in the COVID-19 Race. A Study on Manuscript Submissions and Reviews in 2329 Elsevier Journals. PLoS ONE, 16(10).
[32]. Thompson, G. L. (2010). WOMEN IN STEM A LEGACY OF ACHIEVEMENT CRACKS THE GLASS CEILING. Women of Color Magazine, 9(1), 2. JSTOR.
[33]. Vigna, X., Zancarini-Fournel, M., & Reynolds, S. (2013). Gender History and Labour History: Intersections. CLIO, Women, Gender, History, (38), 2, 7. JSTOR.
[34]. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing Gender. Gender and Society, 1(2). JSTOR.
[35]. Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence about an Old Puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 847-870. JSTOR.
[36]. Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. American Association of University Women.